home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!news!netlabs!lwall
- From: lwall@netlabs.com (Larry Wall)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.perl
- Subject: Re: Religion (was: Re: coding style (was Re: Perl language formatting conventions?))
- Message-ID: <1992Sep11.200227.23995@netlabs.com>
- Date: 11 Sep 92 20:02:27 GMT
- References: <1992Aug27.072110.24646@news.Hawaii.Edu> <1992Aug27.180029.19638@netlabs.com> <1992Sep9.233310.29905@etnibsd.uucp>
- Sender: news@netlabs.com
- Organization: NetLabs, Inc.
- Lines: 48
- Nntp-Posting-Host: scalpel.netlabs.com
-
- In article <1992Sep9.233310.29905@etnibsd.uucp> vsh@etnibsd.uucp (Steve Harris) writes:
- : In article <1992Aug27.180029.19638@netlabs.com> lwall@netlabs.com (Larry Wall) writes:
- : >
- : >That probably just means I need to add a case statement to Perl. But the
- : >minimalist in me rebels. :-)
- : >
- : >You want religion, I got religion...
- : >
- : >Larry
- :
- : Amen!
- :
- : It seems that the Cannonical :-) perl style is most closely related to
- : Hinduism -- consider the richness of its mythology and the seemingly
- : endless scope of its pantheon, contrasted with the underlying principle
- : that the multiciplicity of forms derives from a duality which arises
- : from a unity which emerges out of nothingness.
-
- Well, in actual fact, it derives more from a Trinity that is also a
- Unity. Hinduism isn't the only "rich" mythology[1] around, after all... :-)
-
- I prefer C. S. Lewis's classification of religions into "thick" and
- "thin". And like Lewis, I appreciate a religion that can be approached
- in both ways simulataneously. Something that is Real ought to be simple
- enough for the beginner to understand, and too complicated for the
- expert to understand. These are the theological underpinnings of Perl.
-
- : Who says you cannot be a minimalist and have a case statement too!
-
- Are you proposing to throw away the "if" statement instead? Or are you
- merely proposing to redefine the term "minimal"? :-)
-
- : But what we really want to know is: do your curlies cuddle up to your elses?
-
- Yes, but my elses don't generally cuddle up to my curlies. :-)
-
- [Though now we're getting into cultural differences, not theological
- differences. People often confuse the two--probably because most folks
- can't tell the difference between an ordinary meme and a theophany.]
-
- Larry
-
- [1] In my lexicon, the term "myth" is not synonymous with "false
- story". It means a story which speaks powerfully to basic human need.
- Some myths are "false", and some are "true", and we can debate which
- are which. But historicity is not the primary disinguishing
- characteristic of myth. Torque is. Authors of all sizes adore torque.
- [Though it always helps to have an axle, of course. :-)]
-