home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!acorn!eoe!ahaley
- From: ahaley@eoe.co.uk (Andrew Haley)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
- Subject: Re: Forth will Replace C
- Message-ID: <1409@eouk23.eoe.co.uk>
- Date: 11 Sep 92 22:05:38 GMT
- References: <1992Sep11.123911.21622@mintaka.lcs.mit.edu>
- Organization: EO Europe Limited, Cambridge, UK
- Lines: 29
- X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5
- X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5
-
- Mike Coughlin (mikc@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu) wrote:
- : In article <1992Sep11.115043.6038@email.tuwien.ac.at> anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Martin Ertl) writes:
- : >
- : >BTW, how about an obfuscated Forth contest?
- : >- anton
- : This is the last thing we need. It would be like an ugly bulldog
- : contest. How can you judge something when the potential winners outnumber
- : the potential loosers by factors of 100 or more?
- : The obfuscated C contest is very popular, but Forth should
- : do things in the opposite way that C does to gain efficiency. There
- : should be a Forth beauty contest. I could be a judge in such a
- : contest. If I read the comments and understand the program,
- : the author deserves a prize.
-
- Why should this be? Do you not understand Forth? Can you not
- understand other people's Forth?
-
- I have spent a lot of years working with other people's Forth code,
- some of it good, some of it bad. Forth programmers do the same
- foolish things that other programmers do. There's nothing especially
- difficult about maintaining other people's Forth code, once you get
- the hang of it.
-
- A beauty contest is a good idea; the most beautiful software I have
- ever read has been written in Forth. But there's a lot more to beauty
- than just understandability.
-
-
- Andrew.
-