home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!pitt!willett!dwp
- From: dwp@willett.pgh.pa.us (Doug Philips)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
- Subject: Re: An Open ANSI Forth Implementation
- Message-ID: <4053.UUL1.3#5129@willett.pgh.pa.us>
- Date: 11 Sep 92 17:22:08 GMT
- Organization: EIEI-U
- Lines: 17
-
- In article <4051.UUL1.3#5129@willett.pgh.pa.us>
- JACK WOEHR writes:
- + -> But we are wasting our time worrying about C. What we
- + really need -> to do first is to get rid of non-Forth
- + assemblers.
-
- + An intriguing comment!
-
- Indeed. Forth is not usually used to assemble code in a batch like fashion.
- But it is an interesting idea. Perhaps we could come up with a spec. for
- a Forth based assembler, which in turn could be based upon dpANS Forth?
-
- Hmm...
-
- -Doug
- ---
- Preferred: dwp@willett.pgh.pa.us Ok: {pitt,sei}!willett!dwp
-