home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!harlqn!bear
- From: bear@harlqn.co.uk (Andy Edwards)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
- Subject: Re: Tiny proposal for named loops.
- Message-ID: <BEAR.92Sep12155131@eve.harlqn.co.uk>
- Date: 12 Sep 92 15:51:31 GMT
- References: <aldavi01.714376080@starbase.spd.louisville.edu>
- <TSOS.61.714395736@uni-duesseldorf.de>
- Sender: news@harlqn.co.uk (Usenet News Account)
- Organization: Harlequin Limited, Cambridge, England
- Lines: 40
- In-Reply-To: TSOS@uni-duesseldorf.de's message of 21 Aug 92 11:15:36 GMT
-
-
- Hi,
-
- *In article <aldavi01.714376080@starbase.spd.louisville.edu> aldavi01@starbase.spd.louisville.edu (Arlie Davis) writes:
- *
- *>Since the language ...[double click here to expand text]...
- *
- *I like your idea. It could certainly make C[++] code safer
- *and more legible. There shouldn't be any syntactical problem
- *with
- *
- * if [<id>] (<expression>) <statement>
- * switch [<id>] (<expression>) <statement>
- * while [<id>] (<expression>) <statement>
- * do <statement> while [<id>] (<expression>) ;
- * for [<id>] (...;...;...) <statement>
-
- I agree, these would be an added boon to coders.
-
- *Talking about blocks: Have there been any discussions about
- *a possible assignment of identifications to blocks? Something
- *like
- *
- * {<block-id>
- * ...
- * <block-id>}
-
- This is taking C++ back to it's roots (ie BCPL!)
-
- Best Regards,
- andy
-
- +--: Andy Edwards :----------*=================*------------------------------+
- | Macintosh fire fighter, | Harlequin Ltd. | uucp: bear@harlqn.uucp |
- | Deity, PostScript language | Barrington Hall | janet: bear@uk.co.harlqn |
- | level 2 porter and PAP | Barrington | applelink: harlequin |
- | server clone originator. | Cambridge | voice: 0223 872522 |
- | *They that have power to | CB2 5RG | +44-223-872-522 |
- | hurt, and will do none* | England | fax: 0223 872519 |
- +----------------------------*=================*------------------------------+
-