home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
- Path: sparky!uunet!taumet!steve
- From: steve@taumet.com (Steve Clamage)
- Subject: Re: >>>>>> Novice Question on Wierd class definition
- Message-ID: <1992Sep11.181752.3915@taumet.com>
- Organization: TauMetric Corporation
- References: <ssimmons.716144452@convex.convex.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 18:17:52 GMT
- Lines: 20
-
- ssimmons@convex.com (Steve Simmons) writes:
-
-
- |> class B(type) {
- |> type** C;
- |> .more defs...
- |> }
- |>
- |> Is B a template class, or what its it? Is it an anachronism?
-
- |It is a template class... Templates are available with ATT V3.0...
-
- This is not the standard syntax for templates, and this won't work
- with (most) current compilers which implement templates. It may have
- been written for use with some template preprocessor. (Or maybe
- g++ used or uses this syntax.)
- --
-
- Steve Clamage, TauMetric Corp, steve@taumet.com
- Vice Chair, ANSI C++ Committee, X3J16
-