home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
- Path: sparky!uunet!walter!obry
- From: obry@flash.bellcore.com (Pascal Obry)
- Subject: Re: Ada's (in)visibility in the engineering community
- In-Reply-To: dag@control.lth.se's message of Mon, 14 Sep 1992 15:13:46 GMT
- Message-ID: <OBRY.92Sep14133419@cheesesteak.flash.bellcore.com>
- Sender: news@walter.bellcore.com
- Nntp-Posting-Host: cheesesteak.bellcore.com
- Organization: /u/obry/.organization
- References: <1992Sep11.164402.7141@seas.gwu.edu>
- <OBRY.92Sep14094032@cheesesteak.flash.bellcore.com>
- <1992Sep14.151346.5563@lth.se>
- Date: 14 Sep 92 13:34:19
- Lines: 26
-
-
- >>Like Edmond Schonberg said in is comparison Ada 9x and C++ :
- >>
- >>" Although the C++ community would never state it so baldly, it appears clear
- >>to us that C++ is to some extent a reaction to Ada. By extending C with some
- >>of the best ideas of Ada, C++ did in some measure catch up to Ada "
-
- >Ed Schonberg also said in public that he thinks C++ is a more powerful
- >language than current Ada, and less powerful than Ada 9X. (Stockholm,
- >earlier this year).
-
- Yes, I agree too. This was said about Ada 9x and C++ .
-
- --
-
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -- Pascal OBRY --
- -- Room 2D-337 e_mail : obry@bellcore.com --
- -- Bellcore --
- -- 445 South Street voice : 1 - 201 829 4039 --
- -- Post Office Box 1910 --
- -- Morristown, New Jersey 07962-1910 --
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- `` inheritance is surely a good answer, but who knows the question ? ''
-
-