home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.groupware
- Path: sparky!uunet!caen!fribourg.csmil.umich.edu!crowston
- From: crowston@fribourg.csmil.umich.edu (Kevin Crowston)
- Subject: Syllabus of 6 session course on groupware at U of Michigan
- Message-ID: <JBt-ga@engin.umich.edu>
- Date: Mon, 14 Sep 92 19:45:09 EDT
- Organization: Cognitive Science Machine Intelligence Lab, University of Michigan
- Nntp-Posting-Host: fribourg.csmil.umich.edu
- Lines: 324
-
-
- University of Michigan
- School of Business Administration
-
- CIS 521 Groupware: Computer support for groups Winter 1992
-
-
- Course Syllabus as of Monday, August 31, 1992
-
-
-
- Instructor: Kevin Crowston E-Mail: crowston@csmil.umich.edu
- or Kevin.Crowston@um.cc.umich.edu
-
- Note: this is a half semester (1.5 credit) course. Students may
- enroll for an additional 1.5 credits of independent study (e.g.,
- to write a term paper) if they need 3 credits.
-
-
- Course motivation
-
- The use of information technology to support an individual working
- alone on a task--e.g., using a word processor to create a document
- or a spreadsheet to analyze a decision--has dramatically changed the
- way many people work. But in most companies, few documents or
- decisions are the work of a single individual; instead, they are the
- product of a team effort. Increasingly, information technology is
- being harnessed to support such groups of people working together.
-
- These groupware systems will profoundly affect the companies that use
- them. For example, electronic mail reduces the time to send a message
- from several days or even weeks to a few minutes, while eliminating
- "phone tag." Such reductions in "information float" are key to
- reducing product cycle times and reacting to the increased pace of
- competition. Other systems better the effectiveness of meetings--the
- major activity of many managers--helping groups reach better decisions
- with less wasted time.
-
- Many managers, even when they grasp the importance of such systems,
- feel unqualified to play an active role in bringing them into a
- company; they lack a technical vocabulary and the framework necessary
- for both planning and decision making. This course is intended to
- meet their needs.
-
-
- Audience for course
-
- This course is aimed primarily at future line and technical managers:
- those who will select technologies to support their organizations and
- oversee the introduction of these systems into the workplace. The
- course focuses on questions such as: What's available? What works?
- What kinds of tasks is it good for? What problems should be expected
- and what can be done about them? Technology developers and researchers
- may also find this course a good introduction to issues in developing
- groupware systems and in evaluating their effects on group
- performance.
-
- Students are expected to have an understanding of basic computer
- systems and the use of computers in business at the level covered in
- CIS 501 or 551. Students are also expected to have an appreciation
- for the nature of programming and the ability to access the
- University's computer system (MTS).
-
-
- Course description
-
- This course will briefly survey different types of groupware systems,
- such as electronic messaging, meeting support and distributed
- collaboration systems. Students will have the opportunity to use and
- assess real systems, both commercial and experimental.
-
- The class will meet for three hours once a week. Typically the
- beginning of each class period will be used to discuss students'
- experiences with the system introduced in the previous class and used
- during the week. After a break, a new class of systems will be
- introduced and the capabilities of these systems and problems they
- address discussed. Students will then have an opportunity to use an
- example system, either during the remainder of the class or during the
- week. The class meeting place will vary depending on the requirements
- of the software to be used.
-
- In order to provide a focus for students' use of these systems, a
- class project will be assigned. The project will be to develop, as a
- group, a plan for introducing groupware systems to a company. The plan
- will be written as a memo to senior management describing the kinds of
- systems available and possible uses for such systems and presenting a
- plan for implementing the systems. The instructor will provide the
- initial framework for this memo, but it is expected that the class, as
- a group, will use the various systems to reach agreement on the
- content of the memo, divide the work as necessary and produce the
- final product.
-
- The course grade will be based in equal parts on contribution to and
- participation in class and computer-mediated discussions and the group
- project.
-
-
- Computer usage
-
- An MTS computer account will be provided for use for the duration of
- the course. This account will allow students to communicate with the
- course instructor, other students and people outside the university
- via E-mail and computer conferencing. In addition, the class
- assignment requires the use of various groupware systems on the
- computers in the Business School Computer Lab. In some cases, copies
- of these programs will be available for students to use on their own
- computers.
-
-
- Preliminary class schedule
-
- (Note: All sections will follow the same syllabus, but the dates given
- are for section 1.)
-
- Session Date Place Hour Topic
-
- 1 9/14 K1320 1 Introduction
- What is groupware? Frameworks for groupware
-
- 2 Systems for spanning time
- Electronic mail, computer conferencing,
- Lotus Notes
-
- 3 Introduction to class project
-
- 2 9/21 CTS 1 Discussion of use of electronic mail and
- conferencing
-
- 2 Systems for structuring face-to-face
- interactions
- Meeting support systems
-
- 3 Discuss project using a meeting support
- system
-
- 3 9/28 CTS 1 Discussion of use of meeting support system
-
- 2 Systems for spanning distance
- Audio and video teleconferencing,
- multi-media conferencing
-
- 3 Work on project using teleconferencing
-
- 4 10/5 CTS 1 Discussion of use of teleconferencing
-
- 2 Systems for sharing environments
- Aspects
-
- 5 10/12 CTS 1 Discussion of use of Aspects
-
- 2 Systems for structuring interactions
- over time and space
- PREP, Coordinator, workflow automation
-
- 3 Demonstrations of workflow automation
-
- 6 10/19 K1320 1 Discussion of use of PREP
-
- 2 Problems in implementing groupware
-
- 3 Wrap up of course
-
-
- CTS = Collaboration technology suite, a computer-supported meeting room
-
- Reading list
-
- The reading for each topic should be done prior to the in-class
- discussion of the topic.
-
- 0. Introduction Session 1
-
- 0.1. Grudin, J. (1991). CSCW: Introduction. Communications of the
- ACM, 34(12), 31-34.
-
- 0.2. Winograd, T. (1989). Groupware: The next wave or just
- another advertising slogan? In Proceedings of the 34th IEEE
- Computer Society International Conference--CompCon Spring
- (pp. 198-200). San Francisco, CA: IEEE Press.
-
- 0.3. Grudin, J. (1991). CSCW: The convergence of two disciplines.
- In ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
- (pp. 91-98). New Orleans: ACM Press.
-
- 0.4. Ellis, C. A., Gibbs, S. J. and Rein, G. L. (1991).
- Groupware: Some issues and experiences. Communications of the
- ACM, 34(1), 38-58. (first half)
-
-
- 1. Spanning time Session 1
-
- 1.1. Feldman, M. S. (1986). Constraints on communication and
- electronic messaging. In Proceedings of the CSCW '86
- Conference on Computer-supported Cooperative Work (pp. 73-90).
- Austin, TX.
-
- 1.2. Pitturo, M. C. (1989). Computer conferencing: Brainstorming
- across time and space. Management Review, 78(August), 43-50.
-
- 1.3. Finholt, T. and Sproull, L. S. (1990). Electronic groups at
- work. Organization Science, 1(1), 41-64.
-
- 1.4. Malone, T. W., Grant, K. R., Lai, K.-Y., Rao, R. and
- Rosenblitt, D. (1987). Semi-structured messages are
- surprisingly useful for computer-supported coordination. ACM
- Transactions on Office Information Systems, 5(2), 115-131.
-
- 2. Supporting face-to-face interactions Session 2
-
- 2.1. Bair, J. H. (1989). Supporting cooperative work with
- computers. In Proceedings of the 34th IEEE Computer Society
- International Conference--CompCon Spring (pp. 208-217). San
- Francisco, CA: IEEE Press.
-
- 2.2. Nunamaker, J. F., Dennis, A., R., Valacich, J. S., Vogel, D.
- R. and George, J. F. (1991). Electronic meeting systems to
- support group work. Communications of the ACM, 34(7), 40-61.
-
- 2.3. Cook, P., Ellis, C., Graf, M., Rein, G. and Smith, T. (1987).
- Project NICK: Meetings augmentation and analysis. ACM
- Transactions on Office Information Systems, 5(2), 132-146.
-
- 2.4. Grohowski, R. and McGoff, C. (1990). Implementing electronic
- meetings at IBM: Lessons learned and success factors. MIS
- Quarterly, 14(4), 369-383.
-
- 2.5. Lee, J. (1990). SIBYL: A tool for sharing knowledge in group
- decision making. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer
- Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '90). Los Angeles,
- California: ACM Press.
-
- 3. Spanning distance Session 3
-
- 3.1. Johansen, R. and Bullen, C. (1984). Thinking ahead: What to
- expect from teleconferencing. Harvard Business Review,
- March-April, 4-10.
-
- 3.2. McQuillan, J. (1991). An introduction to multimedia
- networking. Business Communications Review, 21(November),
- 74-79.
-
- 3.3. Brittan, D. (1991). Being there: The promise of multimedia
- communications. Technology Review, 95(4), 42-50.
-
- 3.4. Mantei, M., Baecker, R. M., Sellen, A. J., Buxton, W. A. S.
- and Milligan, T. (1991). Experiences in the use of a media
- space. In ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing
- Systems (pp. 203-208). New Orleans: ACM Press.
-
- 3.5. Egido, C. (1988). Video conferencing as a technology to
- support group work: A review of its failures. In Proceedings
- of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW
- '88) (pp. 13-24). Portland, Oregon: ACM Press.
-
- 4. Sharing environments Session 4
-
- 4.1. (second half of 0.4)
-
- 4.2. ShrEdit paper to be supplied.
-
- 4.3. Bly, S. A. and Minneman, S. L. (1990). Commune: A shared
- drawing surface. In Proceedings of the Conference on Office
- Information Systems (pp. 184-192). Boston.
-
- 4.4. Tang, J. C. and Minneman, S. L. (1991). VideoWhiteboard:
- Video shadows to support remote collaboration. In ACM SIGCHI
- Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp.
- 315-322). New Orleans: ACM Press.
-
- 4.5. Stefik, M., Bobrow, D. G., Foster, G., Lanning, S. and Tatar,
- D. (1987). WYSIWIS revisited: Early experiences with
- multiuser interfaces. ACM Transactions on Office Information
- Systems, 5(2), 147-167.
-
- 5. Structuring interactions over time and space Session 5
-
- 5.1. Mantelman, L. (1987). Orchestrating people and computers in
- their networks. Data Communications, (September), 144-162.
-
- 5.2. Winograd, T. (1988, December). Where the action is. Byte Magazine.
-
- 5.3. Neuwirth, C. M., Kaufer, D. S., Chandhok, R. and Morris, J.
- (1990). Issues in the design of computer support for
- co-authoring and commenting. In Proceedings of the Conference
- on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '90). Los
- Angeles, California: ACM Press.
-
- 5.4. Rupley, S. (1989). Meeting makers: Four workgroup schedulers
- that coordinate people and resources. Infoworld, (November
- 20), 63-77.
-
- 5.5. Holt, A. W. (1989). Organizing computer use in the context
- of networks. In Proceedings of the 34th IEEE Computer Society
- International Conference--CompCon Spring (pp. 201-207). San
- Francisco, CA: IEEE Press.
-
- 5.6. Benson, B. H. and Cohen, H. S. (1991). The AT&T Rhapsody
- business orchestration system. AT&T Technology, 5(3), 2-9.
-
- 5.7. Lockwood, R. (1990). The electronic office. Personal
- Computing, 74-82.
-
- 6. Problems in implementing groupware Session 6
-
- 6.1. Grudin, J. (1988). Why CSCW applications fail: Problems in
- the design and evaluation of organizational interfaces. In
- Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported
- Cooperative Work (CSCW '88) (pp. 85-93). Portland, Oregon:
- ACM Press.
-
- 6.2. Kraemer, K. and King, J. (1988). Computer-based systems for
- group decision support: Status of use and problems in
- development. Computing Surveys, 20(2), 115-146.
-
- 6.3. Bullen, C. V. and Bennett, J. L. (1990). Learning from user
- experience with groupware. In CSCW 90 Proceedings (pp.
- 291-302). Portland, OR.
-
- 6.4. Laplante, A. (1992). Group(ware) therapy. Computerworld,
- (July 27), 71-74.
-
-
-
-
-