home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.dcom.modems:13141 comp.unix.sysv386:14203 comp.protocols.misc:678 biz.comp.telebit:909
- Path: sparky!uunet!olivea!xenitec!zswamp!geoff
- From: geoff@zswamp.UUCP (Geoffrey Welsh)
- Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems,comp.unix.sysv386,comp.protocols.misc,biz.comp.telebit
- Subject: Re: uucico w/v32bis vs zmodem w/v32bis
- Message-ID: <a1cTqB1w165w@zswamp.UUCP>
- Date: 9 Sep 92 03:03:21 GMT
- References: <1992Sep08.014059.4694@omen.UUCP>
- Organization: Izot's Swamp
- Lines: 17
-
- caf@omen.UUCP (Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX) writes:
-
- > ZMODEM overhead associated with 1k subpackets is about one half per cent.
-
- ... which is as low as any reliable error correcting protocol, i.e. trivial.
-
- > The overhead associated with network protection varies with the
- > type of data transmitted. With typical compressed files it is
- > many times the overhead from 1k subpackets. MobyTurbo(Tm)
- > reduces this overhead considerably.
-
- Thanks for confirming this.
-
- Geoffrey Welsh, 7 Strath Humber Court, Islington, Ontario, M9A 4C8 Canada
- geoff@zswamp.uucp, [xenitec.on.ca|m2xenix.psg.com]!zswamp!geoff (416)258-8467
- Coincidentally, most people who fight for "fairness" would be
- significantly better off under the system they call "fair"...
-