home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!wupost!usc!rpi!bu.edu!dartvax!kip-sn-49.dartmouth.edu!user
- From: carl.pedersen@dartmouth.edu (L. Carl Pedersen)
- Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle
- Subject: Weird GROUP BY/TO_CHAR(date) Interaction?
- Message-ID: <carl.pedersen-110992122420@kip-sn-49.dartmouth.edu>
- Date: 11 Sep 92 16:28:59 GMT
- Sender: news@dartvax.dartmouth.edu (The News Manager)
- Followup-To: comp.databases.oracle
- Organization: Dartmouth College
- Lines: 96
-
- Can anyone explain the result of the middle select, below?
-
- SQL> select dtgrd, count(*) from lmasv where dtgrd >= '01-JAN-91' group by
- dtgrd;
-
- DTGRD COUNT(*)
- --------- ----------
- 01-FEB-91 4
- 01-MAR-91 47
- 01-APR-91 1
- 01-MAY-91 7
- 01-JUN-91 541
- 01-AUG-91 42
- 01-DEC-91 37
- 01-MAR-92 51
- 01-MAY-92 3
- 01-JUN-92 590
- 01-JUN-93 1
-
- 11 rows selected.
-
- SQL> select to_char(dtgrd), count(*) from lmasv where dtgrd >= '01-JAN-91'
- group by dtgrd;
-
- TO_CHAR(DTGRD)
- COUNT(*)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
- ----------
- 01-JUN-83
- 4
- 01-JUN-83
- 47
- 01-JUN-83
- 1
- 01-JUN-83
- 7
- 01-JUN-83
- 541
- 01-JUN-83
- 42
- 01-JUN-83
- 37
- 01-JUN-83
- 51
- 01-JUN-83
- 3
- 01-JUN-83
- 590
- 01-JUN-83
- 1
-
- 11 rows selected.
-
- SQL> select to_char(dtgrd), count(*) from lmasv where dtgrd >= '01-JAN-91'
- group by to_char(dtgrd);
-
- TO_CHAR(DTGRD)
- COUNT(*)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
- ----------
- 01-APR-91
- 1
- 01-AUG-91
- 42
- 01-DEC-91
- 37
- 01-FEB-91
- 4
- 01-JUN-91
- 541
- 01-JUN-92
- 590
- 01-JUN-93
- 1
- 01-MAR-91
- 47
- 01-MAR-92
- 51
- 01-MAY-91
- 7
- 01-MAY-92
- 3
-
- 11 rows selected.
-
- SQL>
-
- Apologies for lines that are wrapped funny. The question is, where the
- heck did it get the values for the first column in the second query??
- Aside from the order change, shouldn't the 2nd & 3rd queries have given the
- same result? (None of these dates have times.)
-
- I don't seem to have any COLUMN or BREAK commands that are affecting this,
- but even if I did, what could cause this?
-
- Is this a bug? In the kernel? SQL*Plus?
-