home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.compression
- Path: sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!sdd.hp.com!wupost!eclnews!wucs1!oldroyd
- From: oldroyd@wucs1.wustl.edu (L. A. Oldroyd)
- Subject: Re: PKWARE AND ASI AGREEMENT
- Message-ID: <1992Sep8.153242.6290@wuecl.wustl.edu>
- Summary: flame: data compression price hike coming?
- Sender: L. A. Oldroyd
- Nntp-Posting-Host: wucs1
- Organization: Washington University, St. Louis Mo.
- References: <1467.1021.uupcb@meaddata.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1992 15:32:42 GMT
- Lines: 67
-
- In article <...> tim.meade%theweb@meaddata.com (Tim Meade) writes:
- >Dayton, OH -- September 1, 1992 -- ASi and PKWare Inc. announced
- >strategic agreement today, under which the two companies will
- >cooperatively develop platform independent data compression programs
- >and routines.
- [...]
- > -- jointly working to provide an open system solution to data
- ^^^^
- >compression based on PKWare's PKZip program.
- [...]
- >Immediate products available through existing ASi and PKWare distributor
- >channels will include PK Data Compression Library for Unix, MacIntosh,
- >Ultrix, and MVS along with PKZip for UNIX. Soon to be released
- >products include PKZip for MacIntosh and Amiga. Additional product
- >details, availability, and pricing will be announced as soon as they
- ^^^^^^^
- >become available.
- >
- >The Data Compression Library for UNIX and MacIntosh is available
- >immediately for a cost of $495. PKZip for UNIX is also available for a
- ^^^^
- >shareware registration fee of $87.
- ^^^
- [...]
-
- Here is a fine example of exploitation. ASi and PKWare are intending
- to capitalize on the widespread use of a "standard" DOS shareware program.
- Of course, this means the users, WHO SET THE "STANDARD" BY CHOOSING THE
- REASONABLY PRICED SHAREWARE PRODUCT, will now be tapped to pay commercial prices
- for the use of those products. How long will ASi allow PKZip to be cheap
- shareware? Or PKUnzip to be free? PKZip for Unix at $87 is not priced as
- shareware (although there will surely be claims that $87 is cheap in the
- overpriced Unix software marketplace). And porting existing DOS *LIBRARY* code
- to Unix or Mac is not expensive these days [it is the GUI that is expensive],
- given the ready availability of C [and other language] compilers, so the Data
- Comp. Lib. at $495 appears to be an example of "what the traffic will bear".
-
- And an "open" system? That usually means a freely-available specification
- which anyone can implement, even to produce "freeware"! Will ASi publish the
- file format and compression algorithm? [If it has been published, excuse me,
- please, for I have neither seen nor heard of it.]
-
- This would not bug me, except that zip is used so much, and none of that stuff
- is available in any other form! I feel trapped! Bushwhacked! Ripped off.
-
- Personally, I'd rather use Unix tar and compress. While they are not "free",
- they are come with Unix and do not represent extra cost items. DOS should join
- the community, and package tar ("open" spec.) and Unix compress (mass usage ==>
- very modest price increase, if any, for DOS). [OS/2 comes with a compression
- utility, I believe; is it Unix "compress'?]
-
- A suggested moral: beware accepting "standards" which are not open, even if they
- are "free". Possible connection to "there is no such thing as a 'free' lunch"?
-
- By the way, Tim Meade (author of the original article) is President of ASi, so
- his posting was a COMMERCIAL advertisement. Your net bandwidth has thus gone
- to give ASi free advertising, which is being used to raise your prices for
- data compression software. Think about it. Perhaps ASi should reimburse all
- net sites for the costs, by providing free products (;->).
-
- Flame away. (Of course, a "flame war" over this will only give ASi more free
- publicity, so ... what is it worth.) Is there any interest in a count of
- "votes" pro/con the continued use of zip compression?
-
- oldroyd@wucs1.wustl.edu
- [Not affiliated with any software vendors; opinions are my own, and do not
- reflect on the views of any of my employers.]
-