home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.ai:3361 comp.robotics:1733 comp.ai.philosophy:5986
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!rochester!cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!crabapple.srv.cs.cmu.edu!news
- From: sef@sef-pmax.slisp.cs.cmu.edu
- Newsgroups: comp.ai,comp.robotics,comp.ai.philosophy
- Subject: Re: Turing Indistinguishability is a Scientific Criterion
- Message-ID: <Bu7rCD.CMG.1@cs.cmu.edu>
- Date: 7 Sep 92 15:07:24 GMT
- Sender: news@cs.cmu.edu (Usenet News System)
- Organization: School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon
- Lines: 25
- Nntp-Posting-Host: sef-pmax.slisp.cs.cmu.edu
-
-
- From: ward@sun17.vlsi.uwaterloo.ca (Paul Ward)
-
- If I can push a nail into the wall with my own hands, then why would I build
- a hammer?
-
- If I can pull a plough, then why would I make a tractor?
-
- To get into the domain of computers; if I can perform 50 Gigaflops then
- why would I need a Cray?
-
- One does not make machines that merely duplicate human function - they must
- do it better.
-
- Nonsense! We make machines all the time that do jobs that a person could
- do, but doesn't want to. Consider automatic pilots, automatic door
- openers, automatic elevators, home dishwashers, or even dial-operated
- telephone exchanges. One could argue that a human can do each of these
- tasks better than the equivalent machine, but the human would get bored,
- want to be paid a lot, go on strike, etc. So a machine that does these
- tasks WELL ENOUGH is valuable, even if it's not nearly as good as a human.
- Then the humans can spend their time doing things that humans like better
- (or, in certain economic systems, they can starve).
-
- -- Scott
-