home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!jvnc.net!rutgers!njitgw.njit.edu!hertz.njit.edu!lcm1501
- From: lcm1501@hertz.njit.edu (Lawrence C. Mc Abee)
- Newsgroups: alt.irc
- Subject: IRC operators: All bad ? (Silek apologizes to some)
- Message-ID: <1992Sep15.203909.19804@njitgw.njit.edu>
- Date: 15 Sep 92 20:39:09 GMT
- Sender: news@njit.edu
- Organization: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, N.J.
- Lines: 21
- Nntp-Posting-Host: hertz.njit.edu
-
-
- Hello.
-
- Well, first let me thank each and every person who sent me such
- charming e-mail. Second, let me say something I either did not make clear
- or failed to say (and thanks scorpio for pointing this out). Not all
- operators are bad. Some (perhaps 55% ?) are helpful. Perhaps I should have
- pointed out only bad operators I knew instead of lumping almost all operators
- in a group.
- The thing is, the bad operators overshadow the good ones. It is
- an unfortunate thing. I will say this to any operators I may have offended,
- IF I was wrong, I apologize. I know operators exists that are very helpful.
- But to the ones I know are bad, I would refer you to my first post on this
- subject.
-
- (p.s. Anyone interested in getting a "Top 20 Worst Operators " List?)
-
- Later,
- --
- "When you have eliminated the possible, whatever remains,
- however improbable, must be the TRUTH !" Sherlock Holmes.
-