home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #19 / NN_1992_19.iso / spool / talk / rape / 2359 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1992-08-29  |  1.2 KB
  1. Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!malgudi.oar.net!uoft02.utoledo.edu!dcrosgr
  2. From: dcrosgr@uoft02.utoledo.edu
  3. Newsgroups: talk.rape
  4. Subject: BE's attorney.
  5. Message-ID: <1992Aug29.022901.9768@uoft02.utoledo.edu>
  6. Date: 29 Aug 92 02:29:01 EST
  7. References: <1992Aug25.230049.9693@uoft02.utoledo.edu> <1992Aug27.215024.18041@CSD-NewsHost.Stanford.EDU> <14368@auspex-gw.auspex.com>
  8. Organization: University of Toledo, Computer Services
  9. Lines: 19
  10.  
  11. In article <14368@auspex-gw.auspex.com>, bae@Auspex.COM (Brian Ehrmantraut) writes:
  12. > In article <1992Aug27.215024.18041@CSD-NewsHost.Stanford.EDU>, andy@SAIL.Stanford.EDU (Andy Freeman) writes:
  13. >> In article <1992Aug26.235013.9720@uoft02.utoledo.edu> dcrosgr@uoft02.utoledo.edu writes:
  14. >> >I say you are making this 'code' up. I am stating that you either are:
  15. >> >
  16. >> >1. Not being honest.
  17. >> >2. Not being aware of what you 'alleged; code says or how it has been
  18. >> >interpreted.
  19. >> 
  20. >> Meanwhile, people who have looked for the section I'm referring to have
  21. >> found it, and found that I accurately interpreted it.
  22. > 
  23. >     I even checked with my attorney today, and had my, and Andy's, 
  24. > conclusions affirmed.  DC is full of hot air.
  25.  
  26. This attorney have a name?
  27.  
  28. DC
  29.  
  30.