home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.rape
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!eff!news.oc.com!spssig.spss.com!uchinews!ellis!thf2
- From: thf2@ellis.uchicago.edu (Ted Frank)
- Subject: Re: Self-Defense in the Home
- Message-ID: <1992Aug26.233509.27493@midway.uchicago.edu>
- Sender: news@uchinews.uchicago.edu (News System)
- Reply-To: thf2@midway.uchicago.edu
- Organization: University of Chicago Computing Organizations
- References: <1992Aug18.005905.9535@uoft02.utoledo.edu> <1992Aug26.044848.15372@midway.uchicago.edu> <1992Aug26.113321.9702@uoft02.utoledo.edu>
- Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 23:35:09 GMT
- Lines: 16
-
- In article <1992Aug26.113321.9702@uoft02.utoledo.edu> dcrosgr@uoft02.utoledo.edu writes:
- >In article <1992Aug26.044848.15372@midway.uchicago.edu>, thf2@quads.uchicago.edu (Ted Frank) writes:
- >> Can you tell us which state it is that does not permit the use of
- >> deadly force to prevent the commission of a felony in your own home?
- >
- >The rule of thumb is that the farther west you go, the more they permit deadly
- >force at the drop of a hat--except for CA.
-
- Cute answer. But not one that answers the question I asked. Name the
- state that wouldn't allow the use of deadly force in the hypothetical
- you posed.
- --
- ......................................................
- ted frank | thf2@midway.uchicago.edu | std disclaimers
- the university of chicago law skool, chicago, illinois
- it's log! log! log! it's big, it's heavy, it's wood
-