home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #19 / NN_1992_19.iso / spool / talk / environm / 3485 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1992-09-01  |  1.2 KB
  1. Xref: sparky talk.environment:3485 talk.politics.misc:43239
  2. Newsgroups: talk.environment,talk.politics.misc
  3. Path: sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!wupost!sdd.hp.com!caen!destroyer!fmsrl7!lynx!nmsu.edu!opus!ataylor
  4. From: ataylor@nmsu.edu (Nosy)
  5. Subject: Re: BUSH Administration Hushes Auto Efficiency Studies
  6. In-Reply-To: de5@ORNL.GOV's message of Tue, 1 Sep 1992 11:42:35 GMT
  7. Message-ID: <ATAYLOR.92Sep1185744@gauss.nmsu.edu>
  8. Followup-To: talk.environment
  9. Sender: usenet@nmsu.edu
  10. Organization: NMSU Computer Science
  11. References: <9208312141.AA23105@poly.math.cornell.edu>
  12.     <31AUG199223103328@zeus.tamu.edu> <1992Sep1.114235.3663@ornl.gov>
  13. Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1992 01:57:44 GMT
  14. Lines: 15
  15.  
  16. In article <1992Sep1.114235.3663@ornl.gov> de5@ORNL.GOV (Dave Sill) writes:
  17.  
  18. <   But what's wrong with CAFE?  
  19.     
  20.     It kills people. Lighter-weight cars are not as 
  21.     crashworthy; more people are injured and/or killed
  22.     in auto crashes in lighter-weight cars. 
  23.  
  24.     Don't take my word for it, check with the Department
  25.     of Transportation.
  26.  
  27. <And why not use *both* CAFE *and* gas taxes to
  28. <   encourage efficiency and discourage driving?
  29.  
  30.     "No oil for blood"...now, where did I read that again?
  31.