home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.bizarre
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!destroyer!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!eff!news.oc.com!mercury.unt.edu!ponder.csci.unt.edu!chris
- From: chris@ponder.csci.unt.edu (chris gleaves)
- Subject: Re: English usage
- Message-ID: <1992Sep1.184222.27916@mercury.unt.edu>
- Sender: usenet@mercury.unt.edu (UNT USENet Adminstrator)
- Organization: University of North Texas, Denton
- References: <7391@skye.ed.ac.uk> <1992Aug31.200138.7674@mercury.unt.edu> <1992Aug31.230410.25848@terminator.cc.umich.edu>
- Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1992 18:42:22 GMT
- Lines: 25
-
- In article <1992Aug31.230410.25848@terminator.cc.umich.edu> ajd@itl.itd.umich.edu (Arthur Delano) writes:
- >In article <1992Aug31.200138.7674@mercury.unt.edu> I wrote:
-
- [ stuff I wrote deleted for readability ]
-
- >
- >Uh-huh.
- >Mmmm hm.
- >
- >And then you have to buy replacements for all the things he would've
- >stolen anyhow, as jewelry pockmarked with lead shot is of no use to
- >anyone.
- >
- >AjD
- >and the insurance won't pay for it
-
- Actually, I would not shoot the person to prevent them from stealing
- something. The intruder is a threat to my family since he/she/it CHOSE to
- enter my house.
-
- Anyway, buck shot would destroy the jewelry, not pock mark it. :)
-
- chris
- chris@unt.edu
-
-