home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!newsgate.watson.ibm.com!yktnews!admin!news
- From: Larry Margolis <margoli@watson.ibm.com>
- Subject: Re: Five questions for Doug Holtsinger
- Sender: news@watson.ibm.com (NNTP News Poster)
- Message-ID: <1992Sep04.201631.5018@watson.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 04 Sep 1992 20:16:31 GMT
- Reply-To: margoli@watson.ibm.com
- Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM
- Nntp-Posting-Host: lamail.watson.ibm.com
- Organization: The Village Waterbed
- Lines: 54
-
- In <1992Sep4.172406.5963@ncsu.edu> dsholtsi@csl36h.csl.ncsu.edu
- (Doug Holtsinger) writes:
- > In article <1992Sep04.161541.40172@watson.ibm.com>
- > margoli@watson.IBM.com writes:
- >
- > >garvin+@cs.cmu.edu (Susan Garvin) writes:
- >
- > >> Well, DOD, can you answer any of these questions?
- >
- > > Of course he *can*
- >
- > But apparently you're incapable of remembering the answers which I
- > have already given.
-
- I don't believe you've given answers to all these questions; I certainly
- don't remember seeing them, and others missed them as well if you're not
- lying about posting them. So if you don't object to answering them
- (which you must not since you claim to have answered them previously),
- why not answer them for us now.
-
- Question 1:
- Did Susan Garvin satisfactorily provide a crucial
- difference between a late-term fetus and a neo-nate?
-
- Question 2:
- Why do you keep claiming that "only 3 doctors perform
- third-trimester abortions" is unsupported, in the very same
- posts in which you say you don't like the source of that
- support? (Note that the question is not about whether or not
- you *believe* the support, merely about its existance.)
-
- Question 3:
- What *is* your problem with the beliefs of Judaism that leads
- you to ridicule them in your .sig?
-
- Question 4:
- Why do you continue to claim that Roe guarantees abortion "on
- demand throughout the entire nine months of pregnancy" even
- though the decision specifically says otherwise?
-
- Question 5:
- Why do you rely on the description of a "pro-abort" regarding
- the organization, but then question the veracity of the
- organization's facts on the grounds that it's a "pro-abortion
- organization"?
-
- Oh yes - and please leave the preceding questions intact, if your
- dishonesty doesn't prevent you from doing so.
-
- (2 and 4 are the only ones I've seen you address; 2 was addressed
- after I posted the questions, and you actually answered something
- other than what was asked. Hence the clarification in the question.)
-
- Larry Margolis, MARGOLI@YKTVMV (Bitnet), margoli@watson.IBM.com (Internet)
-