home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!iggy.GW.Vitalink.COM!cs.widener.edu!ukma!gatech!rutgers!concert!rock!taco!csl36h.csl.ncsu.edu!dsholtsi
- From: dsholtsi@csl36h.csl.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger)
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Subject: Re: Roe v. Wade and abortion (was Re: Another good reason to vote for Bush
- Message-ID: <1992Sep4.181130.8070@ncsu.edu>
- Date: 4 Sep 92 18:11:30 GMT
- References: <1992Sep2.032432.10808@ncsu.edu> <laamhpINNr1d@spim.mips.com> <1992Sep4.113450.7336@hemlock.cray.com>
- Sender: news@ncsu.edu (USENET News System)
- Reply-To: dsholtsi@csl36h.csl.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger)
- Organization: North Carolina State University
- Lines: 16
-
- In article <1992Sep4.113450.7336@hemlock.cray.com>
- rja@redwood26.cray.com (Russ Anderson) writes:
-
- >In (Doug Holtsinger) writes:
-
- >> I'd be quite happy to overturn the "government fiat" known as
- >> Roe v. Wade and have the abortion issue returned to the states
- >> where it rightfully belongs. Let the people decide the issue.
-
- > I take it this means Doug opposes the Republican platform's call
- > for a constitutional amendment banning abortion because it would
- > prohibit individual states from deciding the abortion issue.
-
- At the present time, yes. The Democratic platform of unrestricted
- abortion-on-demand throughout pregnancy and the Republican platform
- on abortion are currently minority-held positions in this country.
-