home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!data.nas.nasa.gov!raul.nas.nasa.gov!dking
- From: dking@raul.nas.nasa.gov (Dan King)
- Subject: Re: Roe v. Wade and abortion
- References: <1992Sep2.032432.10808@ncsu.edu>
- Sender: news@nas.nasa.gov (News Administrator)
- Organization: Numerical Aerodynamic Simulation Facility NASA
- Date: Thu, 3 Sep 92 23:40:47 GMT
- Message-ID: <1992Sep3.234047.14310@nas.nasa.gov>
- Reply-To: dking@raul.nas.nasa.gov (Dan King)
- Lines: 20
-
-
- dh>In article <1992Sep2.032432.10808@ncsu.edu> dsh@odin.ece.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger) writes:
- lf>In article <1992Aug31.191507.17372@ncmicro.lonestar.org>
- lf>ltf@ncmicro.lonestar.org (Lance Franklin) writes:
-
- lf> What annoys me is that, although the "anti-choice-to-abort" people seem
- lf> to think that their arguments are superior, they evidently do not trust
- lf> women to see this for themselves.
-
- dh>You make it sound as if every woman is pro-choice. Women are individuals
- dh>who have a variety of opinions on abortion. Please don't ignore their
- dh>individuality.
-
- I believe this exchange right here shows that DOD has a severe reading
- comprehension problem. I really see no point in arguing with someone
- who has such trouble with the written word.
-
- dh>Doug Holtsinger
-
- Dan King
-