home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky talk.abortion:34886 alt.flame:12532 alt.fan.kevin-darcy:370
- Path: sparky!uunet!crdgw1!rdsunx.crd.ge.com!pan!keegan
- From: keegan@pan.crd.ge.com (James G Keegan Jr)
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion,alt.flame,alt.fan.kevin-darcy
- Subject: Re: KILLfile created to prevent flamewar
- Message-ID: <1992Sep3.234846.1428@crd.ge.com>
- Date: 3 Sep 92 23:48:46 GMT
- References: <oqnbvq8@fido.asd.sgi.com> <92237.200055ADMN8647@RyeVm.Ryerson.Ca> <1992Sep1.235756.17435@cfctech.cfc.com>
- Sender: usenet@crd.ge.com (Required for NNTP)
- Reply-To: james g keegan jr <keegan@crd.ge.com>
- Organization: T.S.A.K.C.
- Lines: 70
- Nntp-Posting-Host: pan.crd.ge.com
- Disclaimer: i speak for myself only, unless noted otherwise
-
- kevin@cfctech.cfc.com (Kevin Darcy) writes:
- -> ADMN8647@RyeVm.Ryerson.Ca (Linda Birmingham) writes:
- [...]
- -> >It would appear Ms. Silverio that you and others
- -> >are willing to compromise the rights of women less
- -> >fortunate than you. The poor, the disadvantaged,
- -> >the vulnerable.
- ->
- -> I see no evidence that CJ is willing to compromise
- -> poor women more than well-off women.
-
- i know you don't. really though, kevin, even you should
- realize that your limitations are not relevant from the
- viewpoint of others conducting a conversation.
- [...]
- -> >Every compromise provides a foothold to remove one
- -> >more right. Women are deemed incapable of making
- -> >the most profound personal choice and as a result
- -> >intrusions into other aspects of their lives will
- -> >continue to be tolerated and permitted.
- ->
- -> Another slippery slope argument to throw on the
- -> trash heap...
-
- again kevin, it's perfectly ok with me that you
- struggle with these concepts. the thing is, it's not
- particularly sensible for you to just type words when
- you have no idea of how the words you type relate to
- the item(s) you're pretending to comment upon. imo, it
- would be better for you to let the items you don;t
- understand pass. and just think how much time that
- would save you.
-
- -> >Your profession isn't at risk from fetal protection
- -> >laws, at least not yet. Lets just hope some
- -> >corporate or government bureaucrat doesn't decide
- -> >that programming is a threat to future offspring.
- ->
- -> Sounds like good material for a SEPARATE thread,
- -> Linda.
-
- now kevin, you've been a net.laughingstock for years
- because you've always tried to tell people what to post
- and where. but this is a bit much for even you. don't
- you agree?
-
- -> >What I learned was that there are a number of
- -> >people in this newsgroup who pay lip service to the
- -> >right of bodily autonomy. Who bray loudly about
- -> >personal freedom, yet are willing to negotiate
- -> >freedom away.
- ->
- -> Is an unrestricted right which exists only in
- -> rhetoric better or worse than a restricted right
- -> which exists as black-and-white in lawbooks? I think
- -> you'll find that a lot of women would prefer the
- -> latter.
-
- don't you think it's a bit strange for you, kevin, a
- male with no special skills, talent, or education in
- this area, to tell a female that you know how females
- think and she doesn't?
-
- i think it's time for you to pull yourself together,
- kebbin.
-
-
- --
- ----
- charter member ... T.S.A.K.C.
-