home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!crdgw1!rdsunx.crd.ge.com!pan!keegan
- From: keegan@pan.crd.ge.com (James G Keegan Jr)
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Subject: Re: THIRD TRIMESTER ABORTIONS
- Message-ID: <1992Sep3.220510.1733@crd.ge.com>
- Date: 3 Sep 92 22:05:10 GMT
- References: <1992Aug27.234035.23177@csus.edu> <1992Aug28.041030.14100@wdl.loral.com> <1992Sep2.013115.19899@cfctech.cfc.com>
- Sender: usenet@crd.ge.com (Required for NNTP)
- Reply-To: james g keegan jr <keegan@crd.ge.com>
- Organization: T.S.A.K.C.
- Lines: 22
- Nntp-Posting-Host: pan.crd.ge.com
- Disclaimer: i speak for myself only, unless noted otherwise
-
- kevin@cfctech.cfc.com (Kevin Darcy) writes:
- -> bard@cutter.ssd.loral.com writes:
-
- -> >Is there a crisis of third trimester abortions
- -> >where viable fetuses are killed for reasons other
- -> >than medical necessity?
- -> >
- -> >In short, is there a need for such a law?
- ->
- -> As a concession, in exchange for a permanent,
- -> irrevocable protection of the Right to Choose in the
- -> first 2 trimesters? Maybe there is a need...
-
- you're quite casual about trading away women's
- rights, aren't you?
-
-
-
-
- --
- ----
- charter member ... T.S.A.K.C.
-