home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!timbuk.cray.com!hemlock.cray.com!mon
- From: mon@cray.com (Muriel Nelson)
- Subject: Re: Pro-Choice Challenge (WAS THIRD TRIMESTER ABORTIONS)
- Message-ID: <1992Sep2.171808.13777@hemlock.cray.com>
- Lines: 21
- References: <BtKotw.HGH.2@cs.cmu.edu> <1992Sep2.010233.19424@cfctech.cfc.com> <a3kn0p-.ray@netcom.com>
- Date: 2 Sep 92 17:18:07 CDT
-
- In article <a3kn0p-.ray@netcom.com> ray@netcom.com (Ray Fischer) writes:
- >kevin@cfctech.cfc.com (Kevin Darcy) writes ...
- >>In article <BtKotw.HGH.2@cs.cmu.edu> garvin+@cs.cmu.edu (Susan Garvin) writes:
- >>>Supporters of legal abortion usually take this opportunity
- >>>to point out the fact that a third trimester fetus differs
- >>>from an infant in a very obvious way, leaving aside developmental
- >>>differences. A third trimester fetus is living inside a
- >>>woman and is affecting her health.
- >>
- >>If I swallow your pearls, are they mine, Susie? The "inside the woman"
- >>argument is simplistic and ill-formed. Please reformulate.
- >
- >Your conclusions are simplistic and ill-formed. While the pearls might
- >not be yours, she has no right whatever to go after them. Even though
- >they are her pearls, you still have the right to control your body and
- >prevent her from cutting you open to get at them.
- >
- You really think she'd still want 'em?
-
- muriel
- standard disclaimer
-