home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!rpi!cookc
- From: cookc@aix.rpi.edu (rocker)
- Subject: Re: Should abortionists be allowed to purposely kill viable fetu
- Message-ID: <hzwy#1m@rpi.edu>
- Keywords: decay@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (dean.kaflowitz)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: aix.rpi.edu
- References: <1992Aug31.200508.12731@ncsu.edu> <1992Sep1.144124.10585@nas. <1992Sep1.150941.28459@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> <180jljINNj4b@hpsdde.sdd.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1992 06:19:36 GMT
- Lines: 19
-
- regard@sdd.hp.com (Adrienne Regard) writes:
-
- >In article <1992Sep1.150941.28459@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> smgarvin@nyx.cs.du.edu (susan garvin) writes:
- >>Why stop there, Dan? You can combine the best of Nyikos and
- >>DOD's worlds by having the doctor use a BIG RUSTY NAIL to
- >>perform the procedure.
-
- >Yeah, AFTER he misleads her purposefully on the point of the procedure,
- >the relative risks, and denudes all libraries within a 400 mile radius
- >of "Aborted Women - Silent No More.".
-
- No no no, you guys don't get it! The punchline of the story is
- actually:
-
- "...so you do the abortion, and it turns out that she WASN'T EVEN PREGNANT!"
-
- >Adrienne Regard
-
- -rocker
-