home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!darwin.sura.net!jvnc.net!rutgers!ub!galileo.cc.rochester.edu!troi.cc.rochester.edu!mprc
- From: mprc@troi.cc.rochester.edu (M. Price)
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Subject: Re: aborting females
- Message-ID: <1992Sep1.213546.25081@galileo.cc.rochester.edu>
- Date: 1 Sep 92 21:35:46 GMT
- References: <1992Aug26.184902.15287@nwnexus.WA.COM> <1992Aug27.190809.26107@u.washington.edu> <1992Aug28.180126.4779@galileo.cc.rochester.edu> <1992Sep1.201106.19760@u.washington.edu>
- Sender: news@galileo.cc.rochester.edu
- Organization: University of Rochester - Rochester, New York
- Lines: 23
- Nntp-Posting-Host: troi.cc.rochester.edu
-
- In <1992Sep1.201106.19760@u.washington.edu> jnorris@milton.u.washington.edu (Joel Norris) writes:
-
- >In article <1992Aug28.180126.4779@galileo.cc.rochester.edu> mprc@troi.cc.rochester.edu (M. Price) writes:
- >> Actually, it seems that there are many people on the .net (some of
- >>whom have applied to your posting) who would like there to be no
- >>sex-selection abortions, but realize that there is absolutely no way it
- >>could be legislated.
- >>
- >> MP
-
- >But are these people pro-choice or not? I would expect that pro-life people
- >wouldn't like sex-selection abortions.
-
- Sorry --I should have been clearer. And I can only speak for myself,
- but I am pro-choice (despite Peter Nyikos's attempt to label me
- otherwise. And I do not morally approve of sex-selction abortions.
- However, it is not for me to decide that because I don't like them, they
- should be illegal (Hint: I don't like smoking cigarettes much either).
-
- Clear enough for ya?
-
- MP
- >Joel
-