home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky talk.abortion:34372 alt.abortion.inequity:3398
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion,alt.abortion.inequity
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!The-Star.honeywell.com!umn.edu!mmm.serc.3m.com!pwcs!chrisl
- From: chrisl@stpaul.gov (Chris A Lyman)
- Subject: Re: Legal Questions
- Message-ID: <1992Sep1.204314.19152@pwcs.stpaul.gov>
- Sender: news@pwcs.stpaul.gov (USENET news administration)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: krang
- Organization: City of Saint Paul Public Works
- References: <1992Aug31.142638.11974@advtech.uswest.com> <nzhn-zf.ray@netcom.com> <siyemop@Unify.Com>
- Distribution: usa
- Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1992 20:43:14 GMT
- Lines: 29
-
- sean@Unify.com (Sean P. Curley) writes:
- > ray@netcom.com (Ray Fischer) writes:
-
- >> I don't beleive for an instant that you really want to see legal personhood
- >> begin at conception. To do so would require that murder charges be filed
- >> against any women who gets an abortion. Engaging in any hazardous activity
- >> while pregnant would be child endangerment.
- >>
- >> Is THIS the sort of world you want to live in?
-
- > That is exactly what I want. I do consider it a person at conception and I
- > think murder charges should be filed against any women who gets an abortion
-
- If it is a person at conception, do we charge the woman with involuntary
- manslaughter if it fails to implant? Just for your information, about 1/3
- of all products of conception fail to implant and get washed out during
- menstration. Just a little reality check here...
-
- > - and my wife has said the same thing...
-
- Bully for her. You might ask her if a pregnant woman should be charged with
- child endangerment for smoking, drinking or sitting in a sauna.
-
-
-
- --
- Chris Lyman / email: chrisl@pwcs.stpaul.gov / #include <std.disclaimers.h>
- "No I don't know that atheists should be considered as citizens, nor should
- they be considered patriots. This is one nation under God." -- George Bush
-