home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky talk.abortion:34737 alt.abortion.inequity:3449
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion,alt.abortion.inequity
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!ncar!csn!cherokee!eatdust!stevens
- From: stevens@eatdust (John Stevens)
- Subject: Re: Observations
- Message-ID: <1992Sep3.144136.26150@advtech.uswest.com>
- Sender: stevens@uswest.com (John Stevens)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: eatdust.it.uswc.uswest.com
- Organization: Not today, thanks. I gave at the office.
- References: <1992Sep01.194547.36143@watson.ibm.com>
- Distribution: usa
- Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 14:41:36 GMT
- Lines: 28
-
- In article <1992Sep01.194547.36143@watson.ibm.com> margoli@watson.ibm.com writes:
- >In <1992Sep1.172929.12103@advtech.uswest.com> stevens@eatdust (John Stevens) writes:
- >Actually, no. I was disagreeing with "on the basis of 'because I say so'".
- >The only reason the FOCA was written was to thwart the efforts of those
- >trying to remove the protections of Roe v. Wade.
-
- Support that. As far as I can see, it IS 'because I say so'.
-
- >> And this is exactly the reason I'm here. Because it isn't an individual
- >> decision. It is the decision of TWO people, father and mother.
- >
- >And what if the two people disagree?
-
- Covered repeatedly in other posts (to other people). I will not repost
- here. If you wish to discuss beliefs in detail, lets take it to email.
-
- >> I have no problem with allowing other COUPLES to make their own decision
- >> about abortion. But what you are pushing for, is to cut out the father
- >> entirely
- >
- >No, what I'm pushing for is to keep abortion safe and legal.
-
- So long as abortion is a unilateral choice, you are cutting out the father.
-
- >Larry Margolis, MARGOLI@YKTVMV (Bitnet), margoli@watson.IBM.com (Internet)
-
- John
- stevens@uswest.com
-