NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #19/NN_1992_19.iso/spool/talk/abortion/34221

Internet Message Format | 1992-08-31 | 5.7 KB

Xref: sparky talk.abortion:34221 alt.flame:12465
Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sample.eng.ohio-state.edu!purdue!news.cs.indiana.edu!nstn.ns.ca!cs.dal.ca!ug.cs.dal.ca!franklin
From: [e-mail] (Steve Franklin)
Newsgroups: talk.abortion,alt.flame
Subject: Re: And Now, You're A Halfwit!!
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: 1 Sep 92 01:58:32 GMT
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail].
Sender: [e-mail] (USENET News)
Organization: Math, Stats & CS, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
Lines: 120

In <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Lefty) writes:

>Dance, Steve, dance!

   You just can't keep me outta your steenkin' fantasies now can
ya lefty?
  (okay okay, I"m naughty - I edited a bit... just to clarify things)

>"Methinks the lady doth protest too much..."  Since you seem to be having
>such problems with my presence on talk.abortion and alt.flame, maybe you'd
   Shit, this is nothing my flame-friends (ha!). You should see the mess
I'm taking in talk.bizarre. They hate my guts! *sigh* I dreamily look
forward to having my own group formed, and long towards the day with
sweet thoughts of flame within my own forum.
   alt.fan.steve-franklin
THINK ABOUT IT!


>Coupled with your content-free posting style and your nauseating
                          shoulda used nauseation. (5 vowels, doens't exist)
>sycophancies to anyone you believe might respond positively, yes.  And your
shoulda used sycophanciunciation (5 vowels - doesn't exist thougH)

>username just "happens to coincide with a superhero", eh?  No _particular_
   Oh now - coincedence? I chose it silly fool. I suppose I should upgrade
my username, having undergone superpuberty, but I never really got around
to it. Incedentally, you know I'm 19 Lefty - why the hell won't you answer
me, and tell me how old you are (sorry, i just remembered to ask this question.
Been a whil ain't it?) you gonna answer?

>You _are_ a sick little boy, Stevie.

   jee, that means so much coming from you, ya enslaved USENET-addicted
doc'.


>I see.  You're attempting to establish your credibility with me by making a
>variety of vague, unsupported, and unlikely claims.  Hey, keen strategy.

   Actually, I don' give a shi* about your opinion anymore. YOu're a lost
case. I don't even think you've got the brains to start my new group, so
I just post to annoy you once in a while.

>Why don't you cut to the chase and tell me that you're worth more than Bill
>Gates, get daily blow jobs from Paulina Porzikova and Elle McPherson, have
>an IQ of 1500 and are Emperor of North America?  I'd be equally impressed.

   I don't know Paulina or Elle, and my girlfriend Kathy Ireland would
be awfully pissed if she heard you talking like that. She's been such
a good girl, but I gotta stop seeing so much of Fergie.

>> However you see none, because I am not:
>>    a) a kiss up
>Bullshit.  You've been sucking up to Darcy in a completely transparent
>fashion for weeks now.

   Heh - that's funny

>>    b) liberal democrat

>What gives you the slightest impression that I care one iota what your
>politics are?

   Because you are about as predictable as the outcome of putting to "heated"
cats in a room together.

>>    c) a computer geek

>This seems to constitute some sort of extremely potent insult in your
>febrile little mind.  Care to explain it, Mr. Subliminal Psychology Major?

   Yes - you have no life. Understand? I don't see how you can lefty -
but I can't really argue this until I know how old you are. Care to
enlighten us?

>>    d) an amoral yet oh-so-tiresome wanker like yourself

>I'm touched by your concerns for my imagined lack of morality, Stevie, but
>I'm certainly not interested in taking lessons from the likes of you.

   No lessons given though my friend. I'm just being a nice guy and showing
concern.

>Sorry, we got away from that sort of thing decades ago.  We judge people by
>performance these days.
   Okay, so you haven't told us your age yet. Why not tell us or mail me
about YOUR performance. I'd love to know.

>As far as you're concerned,
>the verdict is in.

   Gee, that really hurts Leftie. You see, your opinion means an awful lot.
People like you are going to change the world and make it a better place,
and I can already see that you are a powerful individual who shape and
redirect my future.
*heavy sarcasm - however, I"m sure you'll isolate one sentence to make
yourself look like you have a friend. Be sure and include the part
"your opinion means an awful lot". I bet you don't hear that too often eh?"

>Based on what you produce, you are the USENET equivalent of a manure farm:
>lots of bullshit and hot gas.
   Well said - you've always been such a funny guy.
*whispers* btw - the hot gas is methane, in case your broadened mind
didn't know.

>> I judge a man by his reasoning, and on this you fail miserably.
>Do tell?  The man who can't construct two coherent posts in a row finds my
>ratiocination deficient.  Boo hoo.  Imagine my distress.
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^only 3 vowels... what a waste.

[gets more and more boring. lefty, why are your posts so anti-climactic?
do you really get that bored by teh end/ or is it that you just overexert
yourself? tsk tsk...]

steve
--
aasdSteveFranklin-Subliminal Psychology Major.ks;dlasBlueJaysRULEkasdfeahsdbfl
sd;lfaswoq[eBuyMeAQuadra!!!mbnZMXCNdfsba;KdSPAMiuroqiyetIBMSuxiweuryth'ewr;mxn
qpuepriuPartyOneqtuj;,n.,xnc,kjasFlameMeNot!;lkj;lkgkjd;askElvisLivesjhfquweru
[e-mail],sk;t;lrut[[e-mail],Physics!eq3rwkh;oHA