home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!sun-barr!news2me.ebay.sun.com!exodus.Eng.Sun.COM!hernes-sun.Eng.Sun.COM!emarsh
- From: emarsh@hernes-sun.Eng.Sun.COM (Eric Marsh)
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Subject: Re: Observations
- Date: 31 Aug 1992 18:54:04 GMT
- Organization: Sun Microsystems, Mt. View, Ca.
- Lines: 30
- Distribution: usa
- Message-ID: <la4qmcINN74u@exodus.Eng.Sun.COM>
- References: <1992Aug21.001742.3923@noose.ecn.purdue.edu> <1992Aug25.171409.12451@advtech.uswest.com> <1992Aug27.045340.13162@noose.ecn.purdue.edu> <1992Aug31.162715.17289@advtech.uswest.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: hernes-sun
-
- In article <1992Aug31.162715.17289@advtech.uswest.com> stevens@eatdust (John Stevens) writes:
- >In article <1992Aug27.045340.13162@noose.ecn.purdue.edu> smccabe@author.ecn.purdue.edu (Sarah A McCabe) writes:
-
- >>I don't think it is an unreasonable request to ask that those
- >>who are trying legislate what actions I may take with my own body
- >>base that legislation on something more than "because I say so."
-
- >????? But that is JUST what YOU are doing. You are trying to make
- >the right to abortion a law on the basis of "because I say so".
-
- >All you want to do is try to force people to believe
- >that a fetus is not a human being, and should not have human rights.
-
- >I have as much right to enforce my belief system on you, as you do
- >to enforce yours on me.
-
- >John
- >stevens@uswest.com
-
- I don't want to waste a lot of net bandwidth on this, but John'a
- argument here is really lame. In essence, he is claiming that
- because someone does not allow him to impose your belief system
- on them, they are imposing their belief system on him.
-
- There is a big difference between a non-action and an action. John
- seem to claim that they are the same.
-
- Eric
-
-
-