home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky talk.abortion:33986 misc.legal:16674
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion,misc.legal
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!att!linac!uchinews!ellis!eeb1
- From: eeb1@ellis.uchicago.edu (e elizabeth bartley)
- Subject: Killing in defense of possessions?
- Message-ID: <1992Aug30.153208.20600@midway.uchicago.edu>
- Sender: news@uchinews.uchicago.edu (News System)
- Reply-To: eeb1@midway.uchicago.edu
- Organization: University of Chicago Computing Organizations
- References: <1992Aug27.012112.2026@ncsu.edu> <24187@oasys.dt.navy.mil> <1992Aug28.200352.20459@ncsu.edu>
- Date: Sun, 30 Aug 1992 15:32:08 GMT
- Lines: 19
-
- In article <1992Aug28.200352.20459@ncsu.edu>
- dsholtsi@csl36h.csl.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger) writes:
- >In article <24187@oasys.dt.navy.mil>
- >bense@oasys.dt.navy.mil (Ronald Bense) writes:
-
- >> False, this is a consequence of the above, similar to preventing someone
- >> from walking off with your valuables while in your house by shooting
- >> them. This action is also legal, and it involves the right to kill certain
- >> members of the human species.
-
- >There is no constitutional right to kill a burglar. In some states,
- >it's not legal to kill a burglar, even if they're walking off with
- >your valuables.
-
- Names of states, please?
-
- --
- Pro-Choice Anti-Roe - E. Elizabeth Bartley
- Abortions should be safe, legal, early, and rare.
-