home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Subject: Re: control
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!think.com!unixland!rmkhome!rmk
- From: rmk@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly)
- Organization: The Man With Ten Cats
- Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 05:11:45 GMT
- Reply-To: rmk@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly)
- Message-ID: <9208260011.46@rmkhome.UUCP>
- References: <1992Aug20.161402.14153@nas.nasa.gov> <1992Aug21.002659.16657@noao.edu>
- Lines: 22
-
- In article <1992Aug21.002659.16657@noao.edu> forgach@noao.edu (Suzanne Forgach) writes:
- >From article <1992Aug20.161402.14153@nas.nasa.gov>, by dking@raul.nas.nasa.gov (Dan King):
- >> In article <1992Aug20.134731.522@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> gjh@galen.med.Virginia.EDU (Galen J. Hekhuis) writes:
- >>
- >> [Lots of way cool stuff that Galen writes so well]
- >
- >Hardly. He's all hung up on "control" on the wrong time scale.
- >Only the people who are unwilling to control their bodies _before_ conception
- >are the ones who are screaming about the "need" to control their bodies _after_
- >conception.
- >
- >Nobody is trying to take away anybody's control of their own bodies.
- >We're simply making it plain that it is appropriate to apply that control
- >at the correct time, BEFORE there is a child whose own body is also involved.
-
- So the only sexual intercourse that you've ever had was for the specific
- purpose of concieving a child. And once you had reached your objective
- you stopped.
-
- --
-
- Rick Kelly rmk@rmkhome.UUCP unixland!rmkhome!rmk rmk@frog.UUCP
-