home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Organization: Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
- Path: sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!fs7.ece.cmu.edu!crabapple.srv.cs.cmu.edu!andrew.cmu.edu!ml3e+
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Message-ID: <4eamiHy00iUyA8u2Ja@andrew.cmu.edu>
- Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 02:58:27 -0400
- From: Michael Loomis <ml3e+@andrew.cmu.edu>
- Subject: Re: Pro-Choice Challenge (WAS THIRD TRIMESTER ABORTIONS)
- In-Reply-To: <BtKotw.HGH.2@cs.cmu.edu>
- References: <1992Aug25.035838.2340@ncsu.edu> <1992Aug25.171206.12387@advtech.uswest.com> <0eaiZKe00Uh748UVho@andrew.cmu.edu>
- <BtKotw.HGH.2@cs.cmu.edu>
- Lines: 61
-
- I had some further thoughts about Ms. Garvin's rather derogatory
- comments about my last post.
-
- Ms. Garvin states
- >Ron wasn't talking about infanticide per se, he was talking about
- >euthanasia. There is a rather large difference between the
- >two. You seem to have them confused. This makes you look
- >rather ridiculous, particularly given your attempts at flaming
- >Steve Novak.
-
- I agree Mr. Bense and Ms. Forgach were not talking of infanticide. On
- the other hand, they weren't talking about euthansia as some completely
- unrelated topic. They were talking about exactly the title of the post
- THIRD TRIMESTER ABORTIONS, and the post I quoted was on talk.abortion
- and not some other bboard like talk.euthansia. I don't really
- understand your attack. Perhaps, it is best understand in terms of one
- of Mr. Novak's own post on 25-Aug-92 Re: Abstinence is the only ..
- Steve Novak@jaynes (854)
-
- >> = James Keegan writes:
- >>-> = (Eric Marsh) writes:
- >
- >>-> Holtsinger looks more like Rasmussen every day.
- >
- >>that's certainly true.
- >
- >>-> Is there any support out there for a Holtsinger
- >>-> boycott?
- >
- >>didn't you learn your lesson with the djr boycott? half
- >>the people who, like lemmings, signed it, ended up
- >>replying to djr's posts anyway and looking like
- >>hypocrites for doing so.
- >
- >*I* signed it after it had been in effect awhile _and honored it_ for one
- >reason: he was SO flabbergasted, he began striking in a panic against
- >EVERYone like a rattlesnake pinned under a rock, his already obstinate lies
- >deteriorating into a brainless flapping similar to a tire in an 80 MPH
- blowout.
- >
- >He finally HAD NO ANSWER, not even a stupid lie.
-
- >It was great.
-
-
- What a great post. Mr. Novak is obviously a pargon of etiquitte. When
- my acquitance with someone degerates to such a level, I just ignore them
- rather spend my time writing such. On the other hand, Ms. Garvin, I
- guess you consider it great fun to spend your time, answering whatever
- insane drivel Mr. Chaney slobbers up. I certainly did not mean to
- offend people when I wrote in my original post that "It takes time to to
- write good arguments rather to post 15 or 20 long, insane rantings in a
- row in the manner Mr. Steve Chaney and some of his frequent
- interlocuters". I now now see how it may have been a little close to
- the truth. I feel "rather ridiculous" offending without any intent.
- Anyway, I can not spend any more time playing on this infantile flame
- war. So go have the last word. I don't care. I have better things to
- do with my life.
-
- Michael Loomis
-
-