home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!sdd.hp.com!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!ames!data.nas.nasa.gov!raul.nas.nasa.gov!dking
- From: dking@raul.nas.nasa.gov (Dan King)
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Subject: Re: Item for Chaney's study of abortion--adult/child sex link.
- Keywords: Nyikos failing other arguments goes for guilt by association
- Message-ID: <1992Aug25.231443.21218@nas.nasa.gov>
- Date: 25 Aug 92 23:14:43 GMT
- References: <nyikos.714506449@milo.math.scarolina.edu>
- Sender: news@nas.nasa.gov (News Administrator)
- Reply-To: dking@raul.nas.nasa.gov (Dan King)
- Organization: Numerical Aerodynamic Simulation Facility NASA
- Lines: 27
-
-
- In article <nyikos.714506449@milo.math.scarolina.edu nyikos@math.scarolina.edu (Peter Nyikos) writes:
-
- > This item, for which I am indebted to Charles Wysong, appeared
- >in the _Jackson Herald_, September 30, 1989. It appears between the
- >two rows of asterisks.
-
- [Item about a Dr. Chepko who is an abortionist and child pornographer]
-
- So what is the point in this article? I'm kind of curious if you see
- some link here or what? Does it matter that this doctor performed
- abortions? Does the fact that this doctor did bad things some how
- discredit the pro-choice movement?
-
- >QUOTE OF THE DAY:
-
- > Don't you pro-choicers just _hate_ this?
- > --Stephen A Chaney
-
- As a pro-choicer I'd have to say no, not at all. I find that both
- your and Chaney need to resort to this silly form of argument mildly
- amusing. I think you do are both a credit to your side of the
- debate when you stoop to this guilt by association argument. I
- not only support your right to spew this drivel, but I encourage you
- both to continue.
-
- Dan King
-