home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!gsusgi1.gsu.edu!gsusgi1.gsu.edu!usglkrx
- From: usglkrx@gsusgi2.gsu.edu (Lori K. Rothman)
- Subject: Re: THIRD TRIMESTER ABORTIONS
- Message-ID: <usglkrx.714601741@gsusgi1.gsu.edu>
- Organization: Georgia State University
- References: <23919@oasys.dt.navy.mil> <1992Aug21.192541.10624@noao.edu>
- Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1992 20:29:01 GMT
- Lines: 35
-
- forgach@noao.edu (Suzanne Forgach) writes:
-
- >From article <23919@oasys.dt.navy.mil>, by bense@oasys.dt.navy.mil (Ron Bense):
- >> In talk.abortion, forgach@noao.edu (Suzanne Forgach) writes:
- >>
- >> I see you saying this often, yet you never seem to win any points. Ok,
- >> here are some cases where putting the fetus to death is justified. It
- >> is discovered in the third-tri that the fetus is anencephalic, or that
- >> the fetus is missing a liver, or that there appear to be multiple defects,
- >> as in poor or miising bone growth, open spine, missing limbs, and/or
- >> internal defects such as lack of an esophagus/stomach/intestines, all
- >> of which can cause the fetus upon birth, to die shortly thereafter.
- >> I only state these, as they are enough to refute your statement.
- >>
- >> Ron
-
-
- >Obviously Ron, you've just refuted yourself, since if the baby is going
- >to die anyway due to some defect, there is no reason whatsoever to put it
- >to death!
-
-
- >SF
-
- Suzanne, let me get this straight. If you knew someone who was pregnant,
- and who had just been told by their doctor that the child was going
- to be born with a defect that will cause the child to die within a few
- years, you would counsel that woman to have the child?
-
- I just want to be certain I understand what you are saying.
-
- Lori Kent Rothman
- usglkrx@gsusgi2.gsu.edu
-
-
-