home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.space.shuttle
- Path: sparky!uunet!utcsri!utgpu!utzoo!henry
- From: henry@zoo.toronto.edu (Henry Spencer)
- Subject: Re: Antigravity
- Message-ID: <BtpE8C.Lv@zoo.toronto.edu>
- Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 17:07:23 GMT
- References: <92236.132738PDC103@psuvm.psu.edu> <1992Aug27.021252.4459@nntp.uoregon.edu> <1992Aug27.021933.5608@nntp.uoregon.edu> <BtnIpI.Izx@zoo.toronto.edu> <phfrom.266@nyx.uni-konstanz.de>
- Organization: U of Toronto Zoology
- Lines: 31
-
- In article <phfrom.266@nyx.uni-konstanz.de> phfrom@nyx.uni-konstanz.de (Hartmut Frommert) writes:
- >>(Well, I lie a little bit... General relativity says it is possible, but
- >>only if your machinery can do fun things like accelerating large lumps
- >>of neutronium [assuming you can make it and stabilize it somehow] to
- >>substantial fractions of the speed of light in quite short times...
- >
- >Can you, please, give a reference (seriously) ? Since GR says gravity is
- >curvature -- what is anti-gravity ? anticurvature :-) ?
-
- The only discussions I've seen of this have been Robert Forward's semi-
- technical ones; I'm not enough of a physicist to follow the underlying
- physics in detail. Forward's book "Future Magic" is probably a good
- place to start.
-
- Roughly speaking, magnetic/electromagnetic phenomena come from electric
- charges in motion. Note that you get a rich variety of behavior which
- you would not predict from studying motionless electric charges. The
- various odd GR phenomena -- everything from gravity waves to the Tipler
- time machine -- come from gravitational "charges" in motion. A simple
- mental model of gravity as the curvature surrounding a motionless
- object isn't adequate to explain them.
-
- Unfortunately, it is hard to do experimental work on the GR oddities,
- because gravity is such a feeble force that extremely large masses,
- velocities, and accelerations are needed to produce measurable effects.
- Even just measuring the static gravitational behavior of motionless
- masses is difficult, which is why the gravitational constant G is so
- poorly known compared to most other physical constants.
- --
- There is nothing wrong with making | Henry Spencer @ U of Toronto Zoology
- mistakes, but... make *new* ones. -D.Sim| henry@zoo.toronto.edu utzoo!henry
-