home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!sun-barr!ames!agate!fcrary
- From: fcrary@ocf.berkeley.edu (Frank Crary)
- Newsgroups: sci.space
- Subject: Re: Magnetic Sail
- Date: 29 Aug 1992 16:46:13 GMT
- Organization: U. C. Berkeley Open Computing Facility
- Lines: 34
- Message-ID: <17o9klINNi8m@agate.berkeley.edu>
- References: <QebfaQK00awS0AiVIq@andrew.cmu.edu> <1992Aug29.101135.16007@cs.rochester.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: lightning.berkeley.edu
-
- In article <1992Aug29.101135.16007@cs.rochester.edu> dietz@cs.rochester.edu (Paul Dietz) writes:
- >Unfortunately, I get the impression they badly miscalculated the
- >tension on the loop, which renders the whole idea much less interesting,
- >as the loop would have to be much more massive.
-
- Actually, he didn't calculate the loop tension at all. (At least
- not in the pre-print of the technical paper I have.
-
- He caluclated a mass based on the critical current density and mass
- density of the superconductor, and the loop current:
-
- M = 2pi*RAp = 2pi*RIp/J
-
- Where R is the sail radius, A is the cross sectional area of the loop,
- p is the mass density of the material, I is the maximum loop current
- and J is the critial current density of the superconductor.
-
- Zubrin seems to simply assume the tension on the loop will be low.
-
- A more serious problem is his use of high temperaature superconductors:
- He assumes nitrogen-temereature superconductors with properties like
- those of helium-temereature ones. We don't have anything like that at
- the moment, and the people working in the field have been promising
- them "soon" since high temperature superconductors were first dicsovered
- 6 years ago.
-
- Frank Crary
- CU Boulder
-
- (By the way, does anyone know how to get a usenet feed here at
- Boulder? My new account is on pprince, which doesn't seem to accept
- news commands. Remote logins to my old Berkeley account are getting to
- be a pain...)
-
-