home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!ogicse!emory!kd4nc!ke4zv!gary
- From: gary@ke4zv.uucp (Gary Coffman)
- Newsgroups: sci.space
- Subject: Re: Saturn class (Was: SPS feasibility and other space
- Message-ID: <1992Aug26.170006.8440@ke4zv.uucp>
- Date: 26 Aug 92 17:00:06 GMT
- Article-I.D.: ke4zv.1992Aug26.170006.8440
- References: <1992Aug20.112421.8946@techbook.com> <ewright.714758810@convex.convex.com> <BtJutG.CA3@news.cso.uiuc.edu> <1992Aug25.210314.14787@iti.org>
- Reply-To: gary@ke4zv.UUCP (Gary Coffman)
- Organization: Gannett Technologies Group
- Lines: 17
-
- In article <1992Aug25.210314.14787@iti.org> aws@iti.org (Allen W. Sherzer) writes:
- >In article <BtJutG.CA3@news.cso.uiuc.edu> jbh55289@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Josh 'K' Hopkins) writes:
- >
- >>I think Nick is right
- >>in saying that HLVs have no commercial relevance in this decade.
- >
- >SS Freedom construction and supply IS a viable commercial market for
- >HLVs this decade. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
-
- Really? And I thought Fred was a *government* project. Wonders will
- never cease.
-
- A market requires buyers and sellers. I don't see either in this
- case. NASA is going to use it's in house Shuttle that it already
- owns and has already paid for to build and supply Fred.
-
- Gary
-