home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!csa2.lbl.gov!sichase
- From: sichase@csa2.lbl.gov (SCOTT I CHASE)
- Newsgroups: sci.physics
- Subject: Re: E=mc2?
- Date: 1 Sep 92 18:40:44 GMT
- Organization: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory - Berkeley, CA, USA
- Lines: 19
- Distribution: na
- Message-ID: <25901@dog.ee.lbl.gov>
- References: <1992Aug31.041026.17766@nuscc.nus.sg> <17sacmINNd2s@darkstar.UCSC.EDU> <1992Aug31.094157.17751@u.washington.edu> <5258@dove.nist.gov>
- Reply-To: sichase@csa2.lbl.gov
- NNTP-Posting-Host: 128.3.254.197
- News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.3-4
-
- In article <5258@dove.nist.gov>, gilligan@bldrdoc.gov (Jonathan Gilligan 303-497-3861) writes...
- >
- >Of course, it's reasonably easy to measure the mass-difference in
- >nuclear reactions. I don't know of any measurements of
- >mass-differences due to chemical reactions.
-
- They're getting very close to being able to do this kind of thing in
- atomic traps. Using a Paul trap, I believe, at least one group has measured
- mass differences down to a few * 10 eV. In the next few years a little
- improvement will allow the measurment of mass differences due to different
- electron configurations - weighing chemical bonds.
-
- -Scott
- --------------------
- Scott I. Chase "The question seems to be of such a character
- SICHASE@CSA2.LBL.GOV that if I should come to life after my death
- and some mathematician were to tell me that it
- had been definitely settled, I think I would
- immediately drop dead again." - Vandiver
-