home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.math
- Path: sparky!uunet!tekbspa!tekbspa!esh
- From: esh@curly.tekbspa.com (Edward S. Hirgelt)
- Subject: Re: p prime, p divides ab => pdivides a or b
- In-Reply-To: ceblair@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu's message of Wed, 2 Sep 1992 17:21:47 GMT
- Message-ID: <ESH.92Sep2133747@curly.tekbspa.com>
- Sender: news@tss.com (USENET Network News)
- Organization: Direct Interfaces Corporation @ Teknekron
- References: <Btyo8q.E63@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>
- Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1992 21:37:47 GMT
- Lines: 27
-
-
- On Wed, 2 Sep 1992 17:21:47 GMT,
- ceblair@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (Charles Blair) said:
-
- Charles> My recollection is that a number theory course I took presented
- Charles> this as a difficult result, only proved after doing some stuff
- Charles> with the Euclidean algorithm. Is there a proof which avoids that?
-
- Well, seems to me this follows pretty directly from the decomposition of
- a composite into powers of primes. Something like:
-
- 1. ab is a product of powers of primes.
- 2. p | ab implies that p appears in the set of prime powers of ab at
- least raised to first power.
- 3. Since a divides ab and b divides ab, we expect that one or both of a,
- b have p in their set of prime factors. All the p[i] that are in ab
- have to go to one or the other of a and b.
- 4. Thus p divides either a or b.
-
- OK, its been a long time since my number theory...
-
- Ed
-
- --
- Ed Hirgelt esh@tss.com
- Direct Interfaces Corporation
- San Jose, Ca.
-