home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.math
- Path: sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!usenet.ucs.indiana.edu!newshost.cs.rose-hulman.edu!news
- From: goddard@NeXTwork.Rose-Hulman.Edu (Bart Goddard)
- Subject: Re: Proof of God's Existence
- Message-ID: <1992Sep2.122614.18962@cs.rose-hulman.edu>
- Sender: news@cs.rose-hulman.edu (The News Administrator)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: g214-1.nextwork.rose-hulman.edu
- Organization: Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
- References: <1992Sep1.213206.18901@griffin.itc.gu.edu.au>
- Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1992 12:26:14 GMT
- Lines: 12
-
-
- In article <1992Sep1.213206.18901@griffin.itc.gu.edu.au>
- jchen@tomahawk.me.gu.edu.au (Jinghong CHEN) writes:
- > Proof of God's inexistence:
- >
- > God can do anything.
- >
- > So he can make a stone which he cannot lift.
- ^^^^^^^^^
- oops. You can't redefine your terms in the middle of a theorem
- and expect to make any sense. This is equivalent to
- "This statement is false."
-