home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.math
- Path: sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!ames!data.nas.nasa.gov!wk223!asimov
- From: asimov@wk223.nas.nasa.gov (Daniel A. Asimov)
- Subject: Triangulating a Region of R^3 Bounded by Triangulated Surfaces
- Sender: news@nas.nasa.gov (News Administrator)
- Organization: NAS, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA
- Date: Tue, 1 Sep 92 18:50:11 GMT
- Message-ID: <1992Sep1.185011.18402@nas.nasa.gov>
- Lines: 34
-
- Some usual definitions:
- Let k+1 points in R^n be said to be in "general position" if
- they lie on no (k-1)-dimensional plane.
-
- Let a subset S of R^n be called a "k-simplex" if it is the convex
- hull of k+1 points in R^n in general position.
-
- The k+1 points are the "vertices" of S.
-
- A "face" of S is defined as the convex hull of a subset of the vertices.
-
- Define a compact subset X of R^n to be "triangulated" if X is expressed
- as the union of finitely many simplices whose pairwise intersection
- is a common face, or empty.
- Now:
- Let M be the closure of a bounded open subset of 3-space, and assume that
- the boundary of M consists of a finite number of connected components N(i).
-
- Assume that each of these N(i) is a compact triangulated surface
- (without boundary). Call this the "boundary triangulation."
-
- QUESTION: Is it necessarily true that M can be triangulated in such
- a way that the restriction of this triangulation to the boundary of M
- is the given boundary triangulation?
-
- It is easy to see that this is true if M is convex, but what if it isn't?
-
- --Dan Asimov
- asimov@nas.nasa.gov
-
- Mail Stop T045-1
- NASA Ames Research Center
- Moffett Field, CA 94035-1000
- (415) 604-4799
-