home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.environment
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!ames!agate!boulder!weverka
- From: weverka@csn.org (Robert T. Weverka)
- Subject: Re: population load question
- Message-ID: <1992Sep4.121335.18728@colorado.edu>
- Sender: news@colorado.edu (The Daily Planet)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: drip.colorado.edu
- Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
- References: <1992Sep3.160709.11059@samba.oit.unc.edu> <1992Sep3.171421.5807@cs.rochester.edu> <1992Sep3.205216.2038@den.mmc.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Sep 1992 12:13:35 GMT
- Lines: 88
-
- In <1992Sep3.205216.2038@den.mmc.com> crabe@den.mmc.com writes:
- Stuff deleted
- >
- >Gentlemen,
- >
- >Has it ocurred to any of you population explosion gloom and doomers
- >that if the entire population of the world were moved into the state
- >of Texas that the population density still would not exceed that of
- >Queens, NY? With this in mind, how can you argue overpopulation
- >and keep a straight face? Please explain.
- >
- >NOTE: 5 billion folks/269,000 square miles=18,587 folks/square mile.
- >
- >CJR
- >
-
- Do "Happy go luckiers" think that the trend to the world population can
- continue without bound? At the current rate, in less than 2000 years
- the volume of humanity will exceed the volume of a sphere whose radius
- grows at the speed of light.
-
- All population projections I have seen show the population growth stopping
- in the next century. The difference in the projections is when and where
- the population quits growing. ( and probable assumptions about why is
- quits growing)
-
- The world population in {year, number} format, from 1991 World Almanac.
- {{1650, 550000000}, {1750, 725000000}, {1850, 1175000000},
- {1900, 1600000000}, {1950, 2565000000}, {1980, 4477000000}, {1990, 5333000000}}
-
- linear scale
- # #
- #
- 9 #
- 5. 10 #
- # #
- #
- 9 #
- 4. 10 #
- #
- #
- 9 #
- 3. 10 # #
- #
- #
- 9 #
- 2. 10 # #
- #
- # #
- 9 #
- 1. 10 # #
- # #
-
- ###############################################################
- 1650 1700 1750 1800 1850 1900 1950
-
- If you can't see what is going on, here is the plot on a log scale.
- # #
- 9 #
- 5. 10 # #
- #
- #
- #
- 9 #
- 3. 10 # #
- #
- 9 #
- 2. 10 #
- # #
- 9 #
- 1.5 10 #
- # #
- #
- 9 #
- 1. 10 #
- #
- # #
- #
- ##
- #####################################################################
- 1650 1700 1750 1800 1850 1900 1950
-
- Do "Happy go luckiers" think that the trend to the world population can
- continue without bound?
-
- -Ted
-
-
-