home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.econ
- Path: sparky!uunet!sun-barr!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!news.claremont.edu!ucivax!orion.oac.uci.edu!ttinews!drogges!kevin
- From: kevin@drogges.tti.com (Kevin Carothers)
- Subject: Re: American underclass
- Message-ID: <1992Sep1.181957.20952@ttinews.tti.com>
- Sender: usenet@ttinews.tti.com (Usenet Admin)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: drogges.tti.com
- Organization: Transaction Technology Inc.
- References: <BtK4Jy.2uz@watserv1.uwaterloo.ca> <1992Aug25.225455.2184@midway.uchicago.edu>
- Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1992 18:19:57 GMT
- Lines: 52
-
- In article <1992Aug25.225455.2184@midway.uchicago.edu> sug6@usite-next.uchicago.edu (Patrick Sugent) writes:
- % Since you are really looking for reading material, I'll make a couple
- %of recommendations and keep my opinions short and sweet.
- %
- %In article <BtK4Jy.2uz@watserv1.uwaterloo.ca> idfriedm@hertz.uwaterloo.ca (id friedman) writes:
- %>
- %>I have always wondered why the U.S, the richest country in the world in
- %>terms of per capita GNP, is having such a hard time solving the problems
- %>of homelessness, urban poverty, drugs, etc..
- %
- % Because you can't get rid of poverty by spending money. With the
- %money our government devotes to poverty, it should put every poor
- %person above the poverty line (in terms of straight math.) If someone really
- %knew what the problem was, I think it would be fixed by now. The fact is,
- %no one knows how to fix it and I believe many different solutions should
- %be tried in conjunction with one another rather than assuming that a
- %"Grand Plan" can work.
- %
- %>Of course, Democrats and Republicans yell and scream at each other for
- %>ignoring and neglecting these problems. I am wondering whether people
- %>know of *** good *** books addressing this problem.
- %
- % Well, I recommend a US News & World Report article from April 20, 1992.
- %I also recommend Lawrence Mead, "Beyond Entitlement" and
- %Charles Murray, "Losing Ground". You are unlikely to agree with them,
- %but they do represent two schools of thought on the issue.
-
- Another reading would be "Conflict of Visions" by Thomas Sowell.
- He presents a theory of "social engineering", based upon two extremes; that of
- the "constrained", versus the "unconstrained". The basic philosophy of these
- two outlooks is as follows;
-
- ISSUE CONSTRAINED UNCONSTRAINED
- ----- ----------- -------------
- Human Nature Humans are imperfect && human nature is perfectable
- materialistic && greedy
-
- Equality The best we can hope for education && institutional
- is equality of opportunity change can make everyone equals
-
- Information Never enough to make a perfectable
- rational policy decision
-
- Society Needs to be regulated by the can be a "designed" society,
- general, evolved laws. based on the "common good".
-
- Anyway, I think you can pretty well guess which political party has which
- vision :-)
-
- --
-
- Kevin Carothers {psivax,philabs,retix,quad1}!ttidca!kevin
-