home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.econ
- Path: sparky!uunet!caen!malgudi.oar.net!news.ysu.edu!do-not-reply-to-path
- From: ae547@yfn.ysu.edu (Ronda Hauben)
- Subject: Re: Clinton on Economics (transcript of speech)
- Message-ID: <1992Aug28.115717.9467@news.ysu.edu>
- Sender: news@news.ysu.edu (Usenet News Admin)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: yfn
- Reply-To: ae547@yfn.ysu.edu (Ronda Hauben)
- Organization: St. Elizabeth Hospital, Youngstown, OH
- References: <Aug.26.18.11.25.1992.1730@foglet.rutgers.edu> <1992Aug26.195335.2634@lsa.umich.edu> <seavn2i00WBKQ3vZ1H@andrew.cmu.ed
- Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 11:57:17 GMT
- Lines: 92
-
-
- In a previous article, josh@foglet.rutgers.edu (J Storrs Hall) says:
-
- >ae547@yfn.ysu.edu (Ronda Hauben) writes:
- >
- >(about ice machines)
- >>No labor and nature produced the machine.
- >
- >>It is not that CAPITAL INVESTMENT produced the machine.
- >
- >>Capital investment doesn't produce anything.
- >
- >>A machine is producing ice - the machine is a machine not a
- >>CAPITAL INVESTMENT.
-
- The following examples that you give of what you call *Capital
- Investment* I have found called *arte* in classical economics
- >
- >Think again, please. A machine is the very epitome of a capital
- >investment. Suppose you live on a farm. You have a choice: every
- >time you need a bucket of water, you can walk half a mile to the
- >nearest stream, cup your hands, and walk back trying not to spill
- >the water; alternatively you could spend a day's work making a
- >bucket out of whatever natural materials you had available, and
- >bring back a bucketful of water for the same effort in the future.
- >
- >If you were even more ambitious, you could dig a well, weave a rope,
- >and save the walk entirely. Ultimately, you might build a windmill
- >and a pump and have a regular supply of water delivered automatically
- >to you with minimal further effort on your part.
- >
- >Now please notice that there is NO TRADE whatsoever in the above
- >scenarios. You will do all the labor involved, yourself, whichever
- >alternative you choose. EVERY choice involves only labor and nature;
- >the only difference is how much extra labor you are willing to do
- >at the start to save yourself labor later on.
- >
-
- "Arte" says Sir William Petty, the father of scientific economics,
- is "equal to the labour & skill of many in producing commodities."
- (from Petty Papers, vol I p. 211)
-
- But this ability to apply skill and thought to production to save
- labour is not a characteristic of "capital".
-
- It is a characteristic of the economic categorie of "arte" which
- Aristotle also referred to (also as technique in the Greek sense
- of the work).
-
-
- Thus I agree that what I understand has historically been called
- *arte* is needed - but that has nothing to do with
- Capital Investment.
-
- You have transposed the advantages of technology and of machinery
- and claimed that the achievement belongs to Capital.
-
- But there ere machines before there was such a category as Capital.
-
- Petty has a term *stock* which seems to be closer to what you are
- calling *capital investment* but that has to do with the things
- or funds - not with the ability to make a machine to save labor.
-
- The ability to make a machine to save labor is something that
- has existed before Capital and will exist after Capital.
-
-
- >Doing extra labor now to save labor later on is called "capital
- >investment". Sometimes the early extra labor takes the form of
- >building machines. Sometimes it takes the form of learning skills.
- >Whether the person who does the early labor is the same as the one
- >who does the later labor is completely irrelevant. "Capital
- >investment" is simply the term we use to describe the situation
- >where someone -- anyone -- does extra work beforehand to reduce
- >the amount of work needed afterwards, to produce the same amount
- >of goods
-
-
- So I have found your examples very helpful - but I don't understand
- why you are calling labor saving machinery "capital investment" -
- it is labor saving machinery.
-
- Are you familiar with the term *arte* as an economic category?
-
- Ronda
-
-
- --
- Ronda Hauben email address:ae547@yfn.ysu.edu
- Amateur Computerist Newsletter or
- P.O. Box 4344 rhauben@heartland.bradley.edu
- Dearborn, MI 48126
-