home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!slc3.INS.CWRU.Edu!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!csa3.lbl.gov!jtchew
- From: jtchew@csa3.lbl.gov (JOSEPH T CHEW)
- Newsgroups: misc.writing
- Subject: Re: Technical Writing as an alternative to Technial Development
- Date: 27 Aug 92 22:36:57 GMT
- Organization: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory - Berkeley, CA, USA
- Lines: 24
- Message-ID: <25813@dog.ee.lbl.gov>
- References: <1992Aug26.144554.10913@lambda.msfc.nasa.gov> <l9qdm6INNf3b@male.EBay.Sun.COM>
- Reply-To: jtchew@csa3.lbl.gov
- NNTP-Posting-Host: 128.3.254.198
- News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.3-4
-
- >You might see if, within your current organization, you could switch over
- >from straight programming to being the programmer who spends some or much
- >of his time writing up the specs, proposals, and so on. If such a
- >role is possible where you are, it's a good intermediate step.
-
- That's pretty sensible advice... get into "technical technical writing"
- and, as a salary and status issue, try to remain identified with the
- engineers. There are a lot of nooks and crannies in technical writing
- where knowledge of user psychology, information mapping, desktop
- publishing, etc., isn't important, but hardcore technical knowledge is.
-
- Many of these writers find that all the writing skill they need is the
- ability to put correctly used words together in grammatical sentences
- of tractable length, arranged in logical order. (Not that those skills
- should be taken lightly!) Their product doesn't need to win either a
- Pulitzer or a juried art show, but it had better be correct and have
- the necessary content.
-
- But I encourage you to learn as much about communication as you can.
- It's not as though you're going to lose your technical knowledge in
- the process or anything.
-
- --Joe
- "Just another personal opinion from the People's Republic of Berkeley"
-