home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky misc.consumers:16013 sci.energy:4191 sci.environment:10998 talk.environment:3518
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!agate!agate!jym
- From: jym@mica.berkeley.edu (Jym Dyer)
- Newsgroups: misc.consumers,sci.energy,sci.environment,talk.environment
- Subject: Re: Radioactivity and Superstition; was: Re: Are Your Light Bulbs Radioactive?
- Followup-To: misc.consumers
- Date: 2 Sep 92 15:25:53
- Organization: The Naughty Peahen Party Line
- Lines: 19
- Message-ID: <JYM.92Sep2152553@remarque.berkeley.edu>
- References: <1992Aug24.232439.25914@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
- <1992Aug26.171638.4066@sctc.com>
- <1992Aug26.192043.24001@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
- <1992Aug26.195524.25813@athena.cs.uga.edu>
- <l9ns6oINNmol@utkcs2.cs.utk.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: remarque.berkeley.edu
- In-reply-to: de5@ORNL.GOV's message of 26 Aug 92 21:00:08 GMT
-
- > [Followups, again, directed to misc.consumers.]
-
- =o= I'm just correcting one statement, and I doubt there'll be
- controversy. If so, followups, again, to misc.consumers.
-
- > most folks don't have concentrated [radioactive] sources
- > laying around their house...unless they have smoke detectors
- > or compact flourescents.
-
- =o= I just wanted to point out that this isn't true of all
- compact fluorescents. Those with solid-state ballasts do
- not have radioactive elements. Solid-state ballasts are,
- without exception, of better quality.
-
- =o= (There are also smoke detectors without radioactive
- elements, but my understanding is that there are qualitative
- differences between those that have them and those that
- do not.)
- <_Jym_>
-