home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: gnu.utils.bug
- Path: sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!gnu.ai.mit.edu!friedman
- From: friedman@gnu.ai.mit.edu (Noah Friedman)
- Subject: Re: shellutils-1.7/su
- Message-ID: <9209020548.AA00192@nutrimat.gnu.ai.mit.edu>
- Sender: gnulists@ai.mit.edu
- Reply-To: friedman@gnu.ai.mit.edu
- Organization: GNUs Not Usenet
- References: <9209011629.AA19389@louvre.wbst147.xerox.com>
- Distribution: gnu
- Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1992 05:48:24 GMT
- Approved: bug-gnu-utils@prep.ai.mit.edu
- Lines: 20
-
- I consider group wheel a nuisance. Until unix systems no longer have an
- 8-group limit before things start breaking, the last thing I need is yet
- another gratuitous group to be in. It's a scarce resource.
-
- However, the feature for su you describe is exactly what some hosts in the
- Laboratory for Computer Science at MIT have, and it works pretty well. To
- clarify, su should still let anyone su if they know the canonical root
- password---being in group wheel should just be a convenience which means
- you can use your own password and not have to remember two separate ones.
-
- >I'm not sure why a wheel group is considered fascist? Perhaps define the
- >behavior of su to: With a certain option, look for a user in the wheel
- >group, and prompt for the logname password. This will let su look for a
- >wheel group and user passwords, or just su normally...
- >
- >This is an issue of whether to have passwords on computers...a modest
- >level of security is reasonable so people don't do stupid things (a little
- >knowledge is very dangerous). Of course, if you're malicious, security is
- >just a nuisance...
-
-