home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.windows.x.motif:5872 comp.windows.x:15736
- Newsgroups: comp.windows.x.motif,comp.windows.x
- Path: sparky!uunet!centerline!matt
- From: matt@centerline.com (Matt Landau)
- Subject: Re: OPEN INTERFACE ?
- Message-ID: <matt.714948978@centerline.com>
- Keywords: OPEN INTERFACE GUI developer
- Sender: news@centerline.com
- Nntp-Posting-Host: rapier
- Organization: CenterLine Software, Inc.
- References: <1992Aug25.161416.27216@mr.med.ge.com> <r65eetw@Unify.Com> <BtM4xA.3oF@solbourne.com> <BtM53H.450@solbourne.com> <914ep5z@Unify.Com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 20:56:18 GMT
- Lines: 11
-
- In <914ep5z@Unify.Com> grp@Unify.com (Greg Pasquariello) writes:
- >I actually looked at Solbourne's OI about two years ago when it was in beta.
- >It was quite impressive, but we decided to go with an intrinsics based toolkit
- >instead, mainly because the company was new at this GUI stuff.
-
- But neither OIT nor Galaxy *is* and instrinsics-based toolkit! Like
- OI , they both reimplement the X11 gui styles on top of Xlib. I'm not
- sure what they do on other platforms.
-
- Or did you mean that you changed your minds about the requirement
- for an intrinsics-based toolkit?
-