home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!sun4nl!ctisbv!pim
- From: pim@cti-software.nl (Pim Zandbergen)
- Subject: Re: X386 1.2E (X11R5) binaries for AT&T SVR3.2.3?
- Message-ID: <1992Aug26.234754.18198@cti-software.nl>
- Organization: CTI Software BV, The Hague, The Netherlands
- References: <TJWU.92Aug25125952@e40-008-11.mit.edu> <17dv69INNr8g@agate.berkeley.edu>
- Date: Wed, 26 Aug 92 23:47:54 GMT
- Lines: 20
-
- ilan343@violet.berkeley.edu (Geraldo Veiga) writes:
-
- >I understand that the reason the binaries for SVR3.2 systems are not
- >available is the lack of support for R3.2 shared libs (the binaries
- >will be huge). Are there any plans of changing this in
- >future releases of X386 1.2E? How hard is it to create shared libs
- >under SVR3.2? We, poor 3.2 holdouts, are the ones that need X386 1.2E
- >the most. Maybe is about time to take the jump and switch to SVR4, but
- >I am still waiting to see what R4.2 products are going to look like.
-
- I'm afraid all the wizards that could make shared X libs for R3.2
- have switched to R4 and aren't interested anymore (who could blame them).
-
- Meanwhile, I'll stick with X386 1.1b, maybe recompile it with
- gcc-2.2.2 -O2 -m486.
- --
- Pim Zandbergen domain : pim@cti-software.nl
- CTI Software BV uucp : uunet!mcsun!sun4nl!ctisbv!pim
- Laan Copes van Cattenburch 70 phone : +31 70 3542302
- 2585 GD The Hague, The Netherlands fax : +31 70 3512837
-