home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!mojo.eng.umd.edu!pandora.pix.com!stripes
- From: stripes@pix.com (Josh Osborne)
- Subject: Re: [386BSD]
- Message-ID: <Btr5F5.AJ9@pix.com>
- Sender: news@pix.com (The News Subsystem)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: pandora.pix.com
- Organization: Project GLUE, Merriversity of Uniland, College Purgatory
- References: <p5tullo@sgi.sgi.com>
- Date: Sat, 29 Aug 1992 15:52:14 GMT
- Lines: 16
-
- In article <p5tullo@sgi.sgi.com> rpw3@rigden.wpd.sgi.com (Rob Warnock) writes:
- [...]
- >Although an excellent work, KA9Q's "NOS" is not needed in 386bsd, which
- >already has full Berkeley networking built in. See the man pages for
- >rlogin, rsh, rcp, ftp, telnet, socket, etc.
-
- But I don't think 386BSD _currently_ has support for PPP, or AX.25 (and
- there may be a few other things 386BSD doesn't have), also NOS seems to
- lose way fewer charactors at high speeds. Hopefully we can fix all that,
- but for the moment "NOS is not needed" isn't quite true...
- --
- stripes@pix.com "Security for Unix is like
- Josh_Osborne@Real_World,The Multitasking for MS-DOS"
- "The dyslexic porgramer" - Kevin Lockwood
- We all agree on the necessity of compromise. We just can't agree on
- when it's necessary to compromise. - Larry Wall
-