home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.theory
- Path: sparky!uunet!sun-barr!cs.utexas.edu!torn!watserv2.uwaterloo.ca!watdragon.uwaterloo.ca!maytag.uwaterloo.ca!jfbuss
- From: jfbuss@maytag.uwaterloo.ca (Jonathan Buss)
- Subject: Re: Constructive proof of directed graph unconectivity
- Message-ID: <Bu26LJ.BuI@watdragon.uwaterloo.ca>
- Keywords: CON NLOG NLOG-Complete
- Sender: news@watdragon.uwaterloo.ca (USENET News System)
- Organization: University of Waterloo
- References: <1992Sep3.161109.22586@sbil.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 4 Sep 1992 14:51:19 GMT
- Lines: 14
-
- In article <1992Sep3.161109.22586@sbil.co.uk> tdk@spitws75.sbil.co.uk writes:
- >Immerman and Szelepcsenyi have shown NLOG = CO-NLOG so combining these
- >results we see UNCON is indeed in NLOG.
- >
- >Is there a direct constructive proof of this fact ?
-
- Yes. Both Immerman and Szelepcsenyi proved the result by direct
- construction. An alternative formulation is given by Balcazar, Diaz
- and Gabarro in _Structural_Complexity_II_, Springer-Verlag, 1990.
-
- >Tim Kempster
-
- Jonathan Buss
-
-